Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AtlasStalled

Edmund Burke in “Reflections on the Revolution in France” cited the French lawyers involved as a reason for predicting disaster.
He distinguished between those trained in the law which can lead to Statecraft and middle ranking practitioners who thrive on conflict and live off the creation of such as their sole motivation in life.

He felt that their level of involvement in the formation of the structures and first actions would lead to internal death fights as the new Republic in France progressed and eventually a turn to a Dictator would result.


37 posted on 08/31/2012 8:54:12 AM PDT by KC Burke (Plain Conservative opinions and common sense correction for thirteen years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: KC Burke
My argument has always been this...As admitted members of the bar, practicing attorneys are, while not necessarily government employees, de facto members of the judicial branch. As such, their holding office in either the legislative or executive branches is a conflict of interest.

I'm not saying these persons should not be eligible to run for executive or legislative office, but in order to do so they should voluntarily resign from the bar and maintain no active associations (i.e. partnerships) with active practices, firms, etc.

JMHO.

42 posted on 08/31/2012 9:26:55 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson