Skip to comments.
Marco Rubio Speech - More government less freedom!!!!!!!! [gaffe]
Youtube ^
| 2012-08-30
| zombiedragon69
Posted on 08/30/2012 9:06:13 PM PDT by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
Rubio's gaffe...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aqrYc7CVTzg
"Lets make sure they write that we did our part. That we chose more government instead of more freedom."
TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012rncconvention; gaffe; gopconvention; marcorubio; rubio; rubiospeech
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-123 next last
To: chris37
Cubans are different than Mexicans, they are worlds apart in their politics and attitudes towards this country.
41
posted on
08/30/2012 10:38:41 PM PDT
by
dfwgator
(I'm voting for Ryan and that other guy.)
To: tallyhoe
42
posted on
08/30/2012 10:38:58 PM PDT
by
chris37
(Heartless.)
To: chris37
43
posted on
08/30/2012 10:39:44 PM PDT
by
dfwgator
(I'm voting for Ryan and that other guy.)
To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
I heard it too. Didn’t match with his point. But e is a genuinely good speaker and obviously his mouth was faster than his brain. Better an ok and obvious flub than reading corpsman as corpse man and not knowing anything was wrong, twice.
44
posted on
08/30/2012 10:41:14 PM PDT
by
Yaelle
To: RightLady
When youre 85 you can be excused from mixing things up now and then. Loved him!!
Wow, Rubio looks so much younger! They must have great plastic surgeons in FL.
45
posted on
08/30/2012 10:44:13 PM PDT
by
Yaelle
To: RginTN
No Akin treatment for Dream Act Rubio, eh. Rubios still great but Akin has to get out. There is absolutely no comparison between the two - Rubio merely accidently transposed words...and wasn't talking about an issue like rape. That is not what Akin did.
To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
>> Wonder if he knows yet he got it backwards? No one noticed in the live thread. You hear what you want to hear.
That depends. Did he say it in Spanish?
47
posted on
08/30/2012 10:56:38 PM PDT
by
Gene Eric
(Demoralization is a weapon of the enemy. Don't get it, don't spread it!)
To: Republican Wildcat
>> That is not what Akin did.
You actually deciphered what Akin said?
48
posted on
08/30/2012 10:57:51 PM PDT
by
Gene Eric
(Demoralization is a weapon of the enemy. Don't get it, don't spread it!)
To: Gene Eric
Okay, so if the subject wasn’t rape, what was it?
To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
That was a stunner. I was sure I did not mishear that.
50
posted on
08/30/2012 11:26:41 PM PDT
by
arrogantsob
(Obama MUST Go. Sarah herself supports Romney.)
To: dfwgator
Yes, they certainly are.
They came from where we are going.
And they are warning those of us who will listen.
And go Gators! :DD
51
posted on
08/30/2012 11:56:08 PM PDT
by
chris37
(Heartless.)
To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
I think many people noticed this error, and had to a double take: Did he really say that? And then, people didn't want to point it out. Have mainstream Republicans, like Romney and Marco Rubio really acted against big government? I wondered why Romney pointed out this own father received government help when he fled the Mexican Revolution. Romney likes government help? When he was young, he heard “stories of his family being fed by the American government,” Romney said. So he's for welfare? I read today that while he was working at Bain Capital he benefited from government help which was granted those who performed “leveraged buyouts.” Add to that, the “earnings” were counted as “capital gains,” taxed at the gift giving rate of 15%. Most decent Republicans are against that. They are against Corporate Welfare. However, some of these Republicans are for government aid, like hundreds of billion in aid for failing banks . . . well that dates back to the S&L crisis, for those too young, or too ignorant of history to remember. Government under Reagan and Bush the First grew tremendously; it did not shrink. Government under G.W. Bush also grew. Military spending doubled. This isn't a “democratic talking point.” The Democrats have done the same thing, or worse, depending on the democrat in question. The truth is, many Republicans say they are for smaller government, and really are not. When Gingrich was in the House, he brought home more government “goodies” to his own home district, Cobb County, than almost any representative in the entire Congress. The phrase that Rubio used, “more government, less freedom,” was not a meaningless error. It was a Freudian slip, accidentally revealing the not so well concealed truth about most mainstream politicians and what they believe.
To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
I think many people noticed this error, and had to a double take: Did he really say that? And then, people didn't want to point it out. Have mainstream Republicans, like Romney and Marco Rubio really acted against big government? I wondered why Romney pointed out this own father received government help when he fled the Mexican Revolution. Romney likes government help? When he was young, he heard “stories of his family being fed by the American government,” Romney said. So he's for welfare? I read today that while he was working at Bain Capital he benefited from government help which was granted those who performed “leveraged buyouts.” Add to that, the “earnings” were counted as “capital gains,” taxed at the gift giving rate of 15%. Most decent Republicans are against that. They are against Corporate Welfare. However, some of these Republicans are for government aid, like hundreds of billion in aid for failing banks . . . well that dates back to the S&L crisis, for those too young, or too ignorant of history to remember. Government under Reagan and Bush the First grew tremendously; it did not shrink. Government under G.W. Bush also grew. Military spending doubled. This isn't a “democratic talking point.” The Democrats have done the same thing, or worse, depending on the democrat in question. The truth is, many Republicans say they are for smaller government, and really are not. When Gingrich was in the House, he brought home more government “goodies” to his own home district, Cobb County, than almost any representative in the entire Congress. The phrase that Rubio used, “more government, less freedom,” was not a meaningless error. It was a Freudian slip, accidentally revealing the not so well concealed truth about most mainstream politicians and what they believe.
To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
Being familiar with Marco “La Raza” Rubio’s political career...that comment is not a gaffe
Do not understand how people consider Rubio a “conservative”
54
posted on
08/31/2012 2:28:24 AM PDT
by
SeminoleCounty
(The GOP Media whining over Todd Akin is not legitimate)
To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
That’s a RINO Freudian slip. He meant what he said.
To: MasterGunner01
My hubby said the very same thing.
To: dfwgator
Plus Rubio is a Gator.Well, that locks up about a thousand votes....
57
posted on
08/31/2012 3:08:23 AM PDT
by
raybbr
(People who still support Obama are either a Marxist or a moron.)
To: chris37
Terrible. He should give up his Senate seat to a conservative.
58
posted on
08/31/2012 3:24:30 AM PDT
by
Jacquerie
(Exterminate rats.)
To: MasterGunner01
Ditto that!
Rubio is a slick amnesty-lovin’ RINO who rejected joining the DeMint’s Senate Tea Party Caucus.
59
posted on
08/31/2012 3:41:47 AM PDT
by
newfreep
(Breitbart sent me...)
To: RegulatorCountry
I see what you you did there. Spot on.
60
posted on
08/31/2012 3:49:26 AM PDT
by
commonguymd
(New media has not replaced the MSM. It has emboldened it. Never underestimate the power they have.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-123 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson