Skip to comments.
Robert Reich: How Romney Gets Away With So Many Lies
Business Insider ^
| 08/29/2012
| Robert Reichhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Posted on 08/29/2012 7:16:25 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
To: SeekAndFind
2
posted on
08/29/2012 7:17:27 AM PDT
by
Eric in the Ozarks
(I didn't post this. Someone else did.)
To: SeekAndFind
"A half dozen fact-checking organizations and websites have refuted Romneys claims that Obama removed the work requirement from the welfare law and will cut Medicare benefits by $216 billion."
Nonsense. A half dozen highly partisan organizations calling themselves "fact-checkers" have made the bald assertion that Romney's claim was false without providing a shred of evidence to back it up. That is spin, not a refutation.
To: SeekAndFind
Stand up Bob! Oops! Sorry. You are standing up.
4
posted on
08/29/2012 7:18:40 AM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(Had enough of the freaks running the show yet?)
To: Eric in the Ozarks
Someone in prime time...maybe Ryan or Romney themselves, need to list the new ‘acceptable’ types of work that qualifies as a work. Many of them generate zero income. It is clearly meant to nullify the work requirements.
5
posted on
08/29/2012 7:19:53 AM PDT
by
ilgipper
To: SeekAndFind
Oh, please! The Democrats are the biggest bunch of liars ever to befoul American politics! And it starts at the top.
6
posted on
08/29/2012 7:20:18 AM PDT
by
popdonnelly
(The first priority is get Obama out of the White House.)
To: SeekAndFind
Those are strong words from the venerable Times.lol
7
posted on
08/29/2012 7:21:27 AM PDT
by
facedown
(Armed in the Heartland)
To: SeekAndFind
I like the way Democrats accuse other people of what they do.
8
posted on
08/29/2012 7:21:47 AM PDT
by
popdonnelly
(The first priority is get Obama out of the White House.)
To: SeekAndFind
So we are relying on “fact-check” websites to find out if the pResident removed the work requirement from welfare reform?
Why not just look at THE ORDER HE SIGNED
9
posted on
08/29/2012 7:22:14 AM PDT
by
Mr. K
("The spread of evil is the symptom of a vacuum [of good]")
To: popdonnelly
Oh, please! The Democrats are the biggest bunch of liars ever to befoul American politics! And it starts at the top.Soooo, Al Gore did NOT invent the internet?
In the words of Felix Unger...."don't toy with me, Oscar."
10
posted on
08/29/2012 7:22:16 AM PDT
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
To: SeekAndFind
The “One-pound bag” speaks again.
To: popdonnelly
I like the way Democrats accuse other people of what they do.
____________________________________________________________
Yep. Projection is their middle name.
12
posted on
08/29/2012 7:23:40 AM PDT
by
RushIsMyTeddyBear
(Bocephus hits a home run! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rt_vjPqAVzI)
To: SeekAndFind
Pure, unabashed projection from the most haughty, smug little prick in the universe.
To: SeekAndFind
14
posted on
08/29/2012 7:24:32 AM PDT
by
theDentist
(FYBO/FUBO; qwerty ergo typo : i type, therefore i misspelll)
To: ilgipper
I’m thinking I would do my best to qualify recipients work at activities like journaling, bed rest, massage or motivational reading, especially the reading part. I’ve got such a stack of books on my nightstand.
15
posted on
08/29/2012 7:26:48 AM PDT
by
griswold3
(Big Government does not tolerate rivals.)
To: SeekAndFind
Authorizing the STATES to REMOVE THE WORK REQUIREMENT, is not the same as Obama erasing it himself....doncha know....?
16
posted on
08/29/2012 7:28:40 AM PDT
by
G Larry
(Progressives are Regressive because their objectives devolve to the lowest common denominator.)
To: Mr. K
Do you have a link to the order?
17
posted on
08/29/2012 7:28:55 AM PDT
by
IM2MAD
To: SeekAndFind
But a society without trusted arbiters of what is true and what is false is vulnerable to every lie imaginable. And who are these 'trusted' arbiters? Are they infallible? Are they immune to human bias? Who 'chooses' the arbiters?
Its hard to see how Argumentum ad Verecundiam can be other than fallacious in the world of politics, where men of differing worldviews tend to draw divergent conclusions from the same data.
18
posted on
08/29/2012 7:30:43 AM PDT
by
LucianOfSamasota
(Tanstaafl - its not just for breakfast anymore...)
To: SeekAndFind
How can they remain effective when theyve been so overwhelmingly discredited by the media? BWAHAHAHAHA, snort, pause, BWAHAHAHA!
The media?
Which media?
The one operating in the US of A?
19
posted on
08/29/2012 7:32:15 AM PDT
by
going hot
(Happiness is a momma deuce)
To: G Larry
Yes and I’ve heard the libs say this gives states more control and flexibility, and hey that’s what the conservatives love: state’s rights.
See how they twist it?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson