Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Spktyr

So your solution is to go back to the 70’s and start there? Or maybe it is to just throw your hands up and ride along in your crappy 70’s American car as well? The reason it went the way of the do-do bird in the 70’s and 80’s is because oil was relatively cheap then and there was no will to fund the R&D to refine the concept because Congress had eliminated most and eventually all R&D tax breaks for private investors to use as justification of minimal gains.

Fuel cells are also created to be the inner bladder for pressure vessels as well but most don’t know about them. The intent is to keep anything inside contained while the container it resides in is allowed to change shape even in blunt force altercations. Added to that is the use of propane fueled lift trucks in lots of industrial and distribution settings so it is not like nobody has been pushing this technology forward since the 70’s.

So, do we also ban the delivery of LP or propane because someone might hit the truck while texting, farding or painting their fingernails?

All that is required is the need for anything and the brightest minds in our country will find a way to deliver. Keep the government out of it and instead releases the entrepreneurial power of R&D tax breaks and it will be solved very quickly if it has not been done already for a totally separate industry. Doesn’t that also sound like something that Pickens would invest in?


24 posted on 08/27/2012 5:05:57 AM PDT by mazda77 ("Defeating the Totalitarian Lie" By: Hilmar von Campe. Everybody should read it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: mazda77

No, my solution is to use it as one of MANY feedstocks for hydrogen fuel cell cars. Going with hydrogen means you will never, ever be tied to one production industry or source type for your fuel - hydrogen can be made from source as diverse as applying electricity to water (as part of desalination), catalyzing it out of natural gas, chemically producing it from sewage waste, and the list goes on and on.

If we convert to pure natural gas, we’ll be right back where we are now at some point in the future. The liberal talking point about “Big Oil” will become “Big Gas” and prices ‘at the pump’ will skyrocket any time there’s a pipeline problem or a storage facility problem, etc., just like it does today. Worse, it will skyrocket any time generation demands go up.

Relying on a single-source fuel when a multi-source fuel is available is pretty dumb.


35 posted on 08/27/2012 5:39:07 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: mazda77
The first thing we should do is get rid of fuel oil for home heating. All that can be used for trucking, because there isn't much difference between that and diesel fuel.

All home heating can convert to NG or LPG.

That frees up one he!! of a lot oil for trucks until they covert to something else.

40 posted on 08/27/2012 5:52:58 AM PDT by Beagle8U (Free Republic -- One stop shopping ....... It's the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson