Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The NYPD Explains Why Their Bullets Wounded Nine People Yesterday (It's not their fault)
The Atlantic ^ | August 25, 2012 | Connor Simpson

Posted on 08/26/2012 6:32:13 AM PDT by Zakeet

It's official. The New York Police Department have admitted that all nine people wounded yesterday in the Empire State Building shootout were from bullets they fired at Jeffrey Johnson.

CNN's David Ariosto reports the NYPD said the two officers that confronted Johnson fired a total of 16 shots. "One officer shot nine while another one shot seven," they said. Police commissioner Ray Kelly explained the injured bystanders were hit by ricocheting bullets. The shots hit "flowerpots and other objects around, so ... their bullets fragmented and, in essence, that's what caused the wounds."

[Snip]

The next question the NYPD will have to answer is why the two officers needed to fire 16 bullets to take down one man who, as we can see in the video, was only a few feet away from them.

(Excerpt) Read more at theatlanticwire.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 2ndamendment; banglist; empirestateshooting; guns; newyork; nypdshooting; shooting
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-189 next last
To: cumbo78

FINEST police force in the world, my ass. Lived in NYC for 15 years and the NYPD officers I saw daily were idiotic donut munchers. Enjoy your pension.


121 posted on 08/26/2012 9:53:18 AM PDT by Last of the Mohicans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Iscool

“Perhaps they should be armed with claymore mines instead of pistols...”

Yep, one or two would be enough.


122 posted on 08/26/2012 9:56:47 AM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

ok ok ok i was not on top of it. some police shots missed and struck bystanders. it is the grace of God that the resulting injuries were not severe or fatal.

anyhow, just how often does a loon begin blazing away randomly with a gun in broad daylight downtown?


123 posted on 08/26/2012 10:00:28 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (let me ABOs run loose, lew (or is that lou?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper; All

ok ok ok everybody. i was not on top of it. some police shots missed and struck bystanders directly. it is the grace of God that the resulting injuries were not severe or fatal.

anyhow, just how often does a loon begin blazing away randomly with a gun in broad daylight downtown?


124 posted on 08/26/2012 10:00:59 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (let me ABOs run loose, lew (or is that lou?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: depressed in 06

I always assume reporters don’t know chambers from clips from magazines from barrels from cylnders, or revolvers from pistols, for that matter.


125 posted on 08/26/2012 10:02:12 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy

I hear that the Social Security Admin. has a bunch of .40 jacket HPs coming their way. Maybe they’re being re-assigned NYPD anti-terror squad, for training on sidewalks in front of the Empire State Bldg. Not an everyday occurrence, this one.


126 posted on 08/26/2012 10:02:47 AM PDT by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: uncbob

six of one half a dozen of the other... if as i’m being told now some police shots completely missed and hit bystanders, hollow point would have been guaranteed disaster for the bystanders. i guess swiss cheese with non hollow points is the chosen police strategy. it could be worse.


127 posted on 08/26/2012 10:04:21 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (let me ABOs run loose, lew (or is that lou?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

you can’t stack “bullets” (cartridges actually) in a modern gun. that possibility went out with muzzle loaders didn’t it?


128 posted on 08/26/2012 10:06:26 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (let me ABOs run loose, lew (or is that lou?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: cumbo78
As a retired member of the FINEST Police Department in the world, the NYPD, I’d like to inform you that the overwhelming majority of you would crap your pants in that situation.

Eat $#!+ and die, you moron. Many of the folks on this forum have put more rounds downrange (often on the two-way range) than a city cop fires in his entire career.


129 posted on 08/26/2012 10:07:24 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: GladesGuru

“....As NYC will soon discover, training is cheaper than judgements.

Conclusion: NYPD has inadequate hand gun training....”
*******************************************************************
BINGO -— I don’t think folks here are directing their comments toward the cops so much as they are toward the (evidently) inadequate training. I know that good, continuous and REALISTIC hand gun fighting training is not cheap, but, as GladesGuru points out, “penny wise, pound foolish”.

I think that many concealed carry “civilians” are better trained in gun fighting than many cops. I don’t blame the individual cops for that; it’s an institutional thing. Several cops I know do such training off-duty and at their own expense. They are very good cops indeed.


130 posted on 08/26/2012 10:14:48 AM PDT by House Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot
I was commenting on that 3-barrel, 12-cylinder revolver.

But yes, you are right. Remember the book, "How To Lie With Statistics"? Widely used and applied by many of 'em.


131 posted on 08/26/2012 10:14:56 AM PDT by Carriage Hill (Harry Reid [PERVERT-NV] has Vickie-the-goat in lingerie & stiletto heels, tied-up in his office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: ataDude

Right. One in the chamber, and one in the mag. And apparently he cleared a jam, cause they found a round on the ground by him. Coupled with the apparent 5 he put in his victim, makes 8 total.


132 posted on 08/26/2012 10:15:11 AM PDT by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: School of Rational Thought
Let's see: a construction worker, in hard hat approaches an officer who is in blue uniform. Worker witnessed someone fire 5 rounds (incl. one to the head) around the corner, and has followed "who he has ID'd had done it". He points this person out to the officer, who now has to 1.)believe him, or take it at face value and 2.) begin to follow and then challenge/stop the individual. Does this on the sidewalk in front of the Empire State Bldg at approx. 9 AM with massive vehicle/bus traffic (one way) on 5th Avenue and thousands of pedestrian foot traffic.

Officer is not undercover and the approach is in full view and the suspect clues in to the officer by noting others looking at him coming from behind him. Then officer verbally asks him to stop, and he pulls a .45 and points it at the officer and his partner. When officer does this, people scatter screaming in all directions, officers draw their weapons and don't wait for a shot. They shoot in a highly charged crowded noisy setting and finally drop the suspect. This all happens (visible on video) in 6 seconds.

Point may be made that all rounds should have been penetrating and then the collateral hits from overpenetration more acceptable. Not walking in the shoes of the officers, most sensible people, even those with combat experience (and not police experience, which is not the same thing) would allow as to how looking down and past/around a gunsight in this setting could affect the aim point. It would help to have fewer keyboard/firing range commandos commenting, whether they ever were real commandos or even veteran police officers. It would be well to wait for the full report and ballistics and re-visit this. It certainly serves no purpose other than abuse to denigrate someone's service by assumption of a "desk job". In fact, the thought and commentary isn't rational at all. Deo Vindice.

133 posted on 08/26/2012 10:42:07 AM PDT by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Spray & Pray

I believe these “cops” have been playing too much Call of Duty on the X-Box back at the station.


134 posted on 08/26/2012 10:42:21 AM PDT by mowowie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: School of Rational Thought

Nope. The last thing they needed was more cops on the scene spraying bullets on a crowded street. The should have closed on him with weapons drawn and the instant he turned and showed a gun, dropped him at point blank range.


135 posted on 08/26/2012 11:09:40 AM PDT by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: John S Mosby
Not walking in the shoes of the officers, most sensible people, even those with combat experience (and not police experience, which is not the same thing) would allow as to how looking down and past/around a gunsight in this setting could affect the aim point.

Bullcrap! "Sensible people" don't make excuses for nine misses at ten feet in a crowded street. People addicted to the taste of boot polish, do.

136 posted on 08/26/2012 11:12:42 AM PDT by papertyger ("And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if..."))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides
Several cops I know do such training off-duty and at their own expense. They are very good cops indeed.

Concur.

It is the duty of EVERY armed individual to adhere to that standard.

137 posted on 08/26/2012 11:23:23 AM PDT by papertyger ("And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if..."))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: papertyger
Finally saw the video.

That kind of shooting is inexcusable.

The criminal didn't appear to be targeting people on the street, just trying to get away. Once the cops made contact, the only threat was to themselves, and in trying to protect their own fat asses, they shot up 9 innocent people.

Anyone trying to defend that is a moron.

138 posted on 08/26/2012 11:41:26 AM PDT by Trailerpark Badass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: uncbob

I believe NYPD issues Speer Gold Dot 124grn HP


139 posted on 08/26/2012 11:47:48 AM PDT by donozark (Never loan money to a preacher.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: cumbo78
I’d like to inform you that the overwhelming majority of you would crap your pants in that situation.

What an arrogant and contemptuous prick. Here are just two examples of courageous armed citizens - senior citizens in this case - that put lie to your statement.

65-year-old Woman Thwarts Robbery on Jewellery Store in Garden Grove, California

Internet Cafe Customer Shoots 2 Robbers In Florida

___________________________________________________________

140 posted on 08/26/2012 11:53:11 AM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-189 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson