The DWS pic is funny - thanks for the laugh. You still don’t get it, though. Nobody asked him about the frequency of pregnancy resulting from rape. His candidacy is in trouble because he couldn’t answer a pretty easy question without going off the rails.
You seem to have a principled view on abortion. I’d think it would bother you that his principles seem to be based upon the frequency of those pregnancies, rather than moral value of the lives in question. Why should it matter how common it is?
Thank you for having a good sense of humor.
You still don’t get it, though.
OH, I get it. It's dirty politics.
His candidacy is in trouble because he couldn’t answer a pretty easy question without going off the rails.
AND what would your answer have been ?
You seem to have a principled view on abortion.
Well... Thanks. But I'm not a woman, so according to the MEDIA, and SOCIETY, and our GOVERNMENT, my opinion doesn't count.
I’d think it would bother you that his principles seem to be based upon the frequency of those pregnancies, rather than moral value of the lives in question.
I reread his reply, and how you can infer his 'principles' based on this one comment:
"First of all, from what I understand from doctors, that's really rare,"
Why should it matter how common it is?
You say COMMON, he said RARE. It can't be both. Or.... maybe I am reading something into your comment that isn't there (just like others are doing to him).
Allow me to ask you this. If 10,000 women who became pregnant (from consensual sex) figured out that they could get a FREE abortion by claiming RAPE, and YOU HAD TO PAY FOR IT (which you do), would you then be concerned ?