Then let the libs run as the people who think 10-year-old girls have the right to choose to have sex with 34-year-old men. That’s not “legitimate rape”.... so Planned Parenthood just offers the 10-year-old an abortion to cover up for the Sandusky-like “friend” she wants to have sex with...
If boys could get pregnant, would Planned Parenthood have covered for Jerry Sandusky, when the young boys who “chose” to be with him got pregnant? If what Sandusky did was wrong and morally repulsive, then how does Planned Parenthood get off on their rape-covering crapola - on the taxpayer dime, in full view of everybody?
Somebody needs to say this stuff out loud to Claire McCaskill and the whole stinking rabble.
butterdezillion ... had Akin cited this case and nothing else regarding ‘legitimate rape’ and how the ‘female body prevents conception’ NONE of the insanity would be on parade. His words gave what liberals lacked something to run on.
“No, we ALL need to read it right now, and be ready to respond at the grass roots level, this Labor Day weekend at family gatherings, or any other time the liberals in our respective families are first to bring up the issue, from now until November 6th:
If the U.S. Supreme Court ruled (Kennedy v. Louisiana - 2008 - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kennedy_v._Louisiana ) that the death penalty is cruel and unusual punishment for rapists, why then is the death penalty acceptable for the innocent unborn child? It’s not the baby’s fault.
http://www.rebeccakiessling.com/index.html
147 posted on Wednesday, August 22, 2012 7:42:52 AM by golas1964”