Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McCaskill wants Akin to stay in the race (Missouri update)
The Hill ^ | August 21, 2012 | Daniel Strauss

Posted on 08/21/2012 4:15:07 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued

Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) would prefer for Rep. Todd Akin (R-Mo.) to remain her reelection opponent.

"Elections are sacred, there was an election, so I think the voters of Missouri should be respected [and] not have some big wig fancy people from Washington come in here and threaten him that he's got to drop out," McCaskill said, according to St. Louis television station KTVS.

Akin was the Republican primary contender that McCaskill and the Democrats were hoping for, prior to his controversial statements on rape that have prompted GOP calls for him to quit. That his remarks might have injured his candidacy makes him all the more attractive to the Democrats. McCaskill, however, did not emphasize the political calculations in her remarks to the TV station.

She said it would be a "radical" event for Akin to drop out and the state GOP to pick another candidate.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections; US: Missouri
KEYWORDS: akin; mccaskill
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last
To: RC one; cripplecreek
do you live in America?

Pretty sure that was meant to have a sarcasm tag.

61 posted on 08/21/2012 7:17:36 PM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
SO THIS WOMAN WHO MAULED AND SHREDDED THE CONSTITUTION, VOTED FOR OBAMACARE, MASSIVE TAX HIKES AND TOWED THE LIBERAL LINE IS NOW GOING TO WIN BECAUSE HER OPPONENT SAID SOMETHING STUPID????????????????????????????????????????

This country is going to HELL! Why doesn't anyone care?????????????????????????
62 posted on 08/21/2012 7:34:27 PM PDT by Tzimisce (THIS SUCKS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil
I see you transcribed the broadcast. You have a stronger stomach than I.

"But enough about Republican Todd Akin. Let's talk about Republican Todd Akin!"

63 posted on 08/21/2012 7:55:43 PM PDT by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Of course she does... if he drops out she goes back to being a hostess at the Olive Garden in Cape.


64 posted on 08/21/2012 9:07:12 PM PDT by Volunteer (Though I know that the hypnotized never lie, do ya? - The Who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TChad

Our local news, too. Wall-to-wall, with the exception of weather and sports.


65 posted on 08/21/2012 9:26:43 PM PDT by green pastures (Cynicism-- it's not just for breakfast anymore...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

I thought he was a reasonable individual who made a very bad mistake.

So Ryan and the entire GOP wants him out, McCaskill wants him in ... and he goes along with what McCaskill wants!?!?

Now I am convinced: He’s a moron.

“Clearly he suffers from elephantitus of the ego.”
Apparently. what’s with these careerist pols that need to be taken out with a crowbar?!? Power must be intoxicating.

Akin: Drop out!


66 posted on 08/21/2012 10:25:27 PM PDT by WOSG (REPEAL AND REPLACE OBAMA. He stole AmericaÂ’s promise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: A Cyrenian

Akin is way down in the polls.
PPP salted their poll to give Akin false hope and help him stay in, which is what Democrats want.

http://minx.cc/?post=332101

“Since PPP decided it can’t help itself, I’ve done you all a service.
I went through their ridiculous R+9 sample and ONLY changed the D/R/I proportions to match previous elections, and an even turnout.
With R+9, PPP’s headline screams Akin up by 1. It is an obvious, sick ploy to get this delusional Bio101 flunkie to stay in and cost us a seat.

Here are the real numbers:
If turnout in November matches 2008 (it won’t):
McCaskill 49.25% Akin 39% (this is a D+6 turnout model)

If turnout in November is even, an incredible feat for the GOP considering heavy turnout in St Louis and Kansas City during an election year:
McCaskill 47% Akin 40%.

If turnout in November matches the best we have ever seen in the state (R+3 during 2010):
McCaskill 45% Akin 41%.

McCaskill is a dead duck if we dump Akin. The other candidates from the primary were crushing her up and down. To trail her by four in a best-case scenario is inexcusable at this point.”


67 posted on 08/21/2012 10:46:22 PM PDT by WOSG (REPEAL AND REPLACE OBAMA. He stole AmericaÂ’s promise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides; A Cyrenian

YUP. AKINS IS ACTUALLY DOWN 7-9 POINTS.

http://minx.cc/?post=332101

If turnout in November is even, an incredible feat for the GOP considering heavy turnout in St Louis and Kansas City during an election year:
McCaskill 47% Akin 40%.


68 posted on 08/21/2012 11:08:32 PM PDT by WOSG (REPEAL AND REPLACE OBAMA. He stole AmericaÂ’s promise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Gee, why isn’t this story headline news??? Because it’s a democrat???

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/08/21/minnesota-lawmaker-urged-to-step-aside-after-rest-stop-liaison-with-17-year-old/?test=latestnews


69 posted on 08/22/2012 1:12:31 AM PDT by tina07 (In loving memory of my father,WWII Vet. CBI 10/16/42-12/17/45, d. 11/1/85)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

It was a geared election...to help Akin make it up through the primary and be the final Republican choice. The fact that Akin hasn’t figured this out....makes him either a knowing part of the scheme, or fairly naive (my bet is on the naive). But here’s the bottom line. Even if Akin had not made the comment....the best results would have been McCaskill likely winning 51-49 percent (based on several different sources)....so Akin didn’t have a great chance of winning, and this merely puts it back into the safe 60-40 percent range for McCaskill.


70 posted on 08/22/2012 3:22:02 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

exactly....but if his ego wasn’t so darned bug he would see the bigger picture and step aside, be content with his house seat and ride the gravy train a bit longer


71 posted on 08/22/2012 3:27:30 AM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

Darned bugs!

Kidding aside, perhaps his belief in Life is blinding his objectivity.


72 posted on 08/22/2012 3:34:45 AM PDT by Gene Eric (Demoralization is a weapon of the enemy. Don't get it, don't spread it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: WOSG
I thought he was a reasonable individual who made a very bad mistake.

So did I - until I listened to his Hannity interview, when he exposed his bizarre mental processes to the entire country.

On the bright side, he has plenty of company. The majority of pols suffer from the same crazed ambition, and many of them are also idiots. They just hide it better.

73 posted on 08/22/2012 5:57:17 AM PDT by BlatherNaut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Mccaskill, helped deliver the kenyan nightmare and his insane techniques used to bankrupt our kid’s futures. She is the enemy of every free human.


74 posted on 08/22/2012 6:44:07 AM PDT by Neoliberalnot (Marxism works well only with the uneducated and the unarmed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Akin, a native NYC fool, made the mistake of addressing a technical issue he knows very little about. Fact is, he was right but misstated the issue. Forcible rape, is so devastating to endocrine homeostasis involved in reproduction, that conceptions rates do fall dramatically. This principle applies across many species, not just humans.


75 posted on 08/22/2012 6:44:52 AM PDT by Neoliberalnot (Marxism works well only with the uneducated and the unarmed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

McCaskill is having fun with this now. She knows there’s no chance of Akin winning. Like a cat playing with a mouse before devouring it, she’ll probably even throw his campaign a little $$$$ just to keep this macabre game going until she tires of it and delivers the kill shot.

It didn’t have to happen that way, but unfortunately Akin’s ego got the best of him.


76 posted on 08/22/2012 8:06:01 AM PDT by ScottinVA (Stop the bleeding, Todd Akin. Do the right thing and step aside!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

You bet she does. She smells fear, and cowardice, and is predicting a full retreat from the “pro-lifers”.

I wish I could say she’s wrong.


77 posted on 08/22/2012 8:40:14 AM PDT by LearsFool ("Thou shouldst not have been old, till thou hadst been wise.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LearsFool
You bet she does. She smells fear, and cowardice, and is predicting a full retreat from the “pro-lifers”.

No, McCaskill knows she can beat Akin because of this. Prior to the primary, Rasmussen was showing McCaskill losing to Akin by 3% and losing to both Steelman and Brunner by 6%. McCaskill wants Akin in because he is beatable. Replace Akin with someone like Steelman and McCaskill goes down.
78 posted on 08/22/2012 8:46:25 AM PDT by DaveInDallas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Well of course she does! To her, Akin is a gift from Heaven.


79 posted on 08/22/2012 8:55:21 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (Tantaros: "Plainly put, Romney and Ryan can't push granny off the cliff. Obama beat them to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaveInDallas
McCaskill knows she can beat Akin because of this.

Well of course. It's the voters who'll decide the outcome. She wouldn't stand a chance if not for the fear, the cowardice, and the full retreat of "pro-lifers".

This inevitable loss will fall not on Akin's head but on ours.
80 posted on 08/22/2012 9:01:22 AM PDT by LearsFool ("Thou shouldst not have been old, till thou hadst been wise.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson