maybe his defenders should consider this
Most of his defenders are some social conservatives who are happy that social issues become the main issue in this year election. They want to use Akin’s incident to force every GOP candidate to talk more about abortion, etc., in their campaign.
And Sarah Palin suggested that Obama might want to replace Baffling Joe Biden with someone else (Shrillary?). So now Obama won’t do that because it was her idea. Everyone here thought that was brilliant.
So now many here are saying, if the Dems want Akin on the ticket (O’Really?) we should replace Akin—the conservative candidate who won but recently made a verbal miscue.
What is this? George Costanza “Opposite” strategerizing? “Jerry, what I’ve been doing is the exact opposite of what I think I should be doing and it’s been working out great for me! Following that skewed logic, we should all plan on voting for the Kenyan ...
This is a non-issue. The only reason it’s being posted ad infinitum here is because our GOP-e `Chicken Littles’ are swooning/having heart palpitations over non-stop MSM coverage of the types of things Zero and Joe say all the time ... that’s too bad, to go through life with balls like BBs.
Oh, yeah: No Romney. No way, no how. Why? Because this is a conservative site. And now you’re thinking, “OK, he SAYS `No Romney’, but what he MEANS ... “.
Akin is a conservative. Support him, or keep your pie-hole shut.