Posted on 08/20/2012 7:07:41 AM PDT by Second Amendment First
You mean, "Here we go AGAIN"
Er... you do know that five percent is about the probability of conception for unprotected sexual intercourse in general, right?
It would be more fitting to appoint him ambassador to Dumbf**kistan.
It also doesn't mean that the term "date rape" does not have a political origin, just as "undocumented immigrant" has a political origin as does "EBT" as opposed to food stamps and welfare payment. Those are only a few of the "politically useful" terms that have been created the past few decades.
Ahhh -- we now see where you are coming from.
1. He made a mistake.
2. When Dems make mistakes, do their supporters bale?
3. It’s a mistake, not the end of the world, apologize for the misstatement and move on.
4. We need that Senate seat, it was an easy blow out win.
5. It’s too late to put somebody else on...THEY WILL LOSE.
6. Don’t underestimate the common sense of the American people....he was WAY UP in Missouri...he can still win.
Not very many people. Those terms are relatively rare compared to the overused term "date rape", which was coined to lower the evidentiary standards for rape, and which resulted in some absurd rules adopted by colleges that required a request for approval at each step in the progression toward consensual sex (Antioch College in Ohio).
"Date rape" was a PC, feminist initiative and it became part of absurd rules on several college campuses.
Because their 'calculations' include items like this:
"What further percentage reduction in pregnancy will this cause? No one knows."
Unproven assumptions --> Unreliable 'calculations.'
How many of the latter do you think occurred between invading militias and local women during the Rwandan genocide?
No, what you are referring to are political euphemisms.
‘Date rape’ didn’t replace another concise term.
I’m going to guess that you haven’t had any college-aged daughters.
Yes, academia and liberalism are rife with silly PC excesses, but that doesn’t mean that it’s not legitimate to clarify when the perpetrator of rape was someone known in a date situation.
Jeesh!
My first reaction was that he must have simply meant that Abortion in rape and incest is simply wrong under any circumstance, and that rape and incest are red herrings.
That`s my belief that abortion is wrong in ALL circumstances, and the rape and incest exceptions are indeed red herrings.
Too bad he had to add that a womans body shuts down under rape etc.
Now if a Dr told him this?
I am not a prophet or a seer.... But, Missourians did vote in majority for a dead man, and allowed his widow to take the seat. AND they in majority did vote for the nursing home queen Claire. The year she won the Missouri ballet was loaded to get the 'union' voters out and then of course that 'life saving' stem cell research.
As of this moment I say the seat is now a toss up because that is ALLLLL Claire and the liberals biggest Charity, the JonStewart media, will play Akin's words over and over and over and give Claire the stage to say how ignorant he is.
Perhaps quite a lot. Many may have already been pregnant by their husbands when the rapes subsequently occurred.
The Feminazis have distorted the rape claim so that we have once again come full circle; now, when a woman makes a claim of rape (unless there is a brutal beating or a weapon involved aside from the violation) it's once again suspect.
That's one of the things I hate about the false rape claims; THEY make it harder for legitimate victims to receive justice.
Does this work if she's knocked out or drugged? Or are these not considered “legitimate” rapes?
From the NIH website:
“The national rape-related pregnancy rate is 5.0% per rape among victims of reproductive age (aged 12 to 45); among adult women an estimated 32,101 pregnancies result from rape each year.”
They are saying, then, that there are over 600,000 rapes committed per year.
Everywhere else I’ve seen the figure between 100,000 and 300,000.
NIH seems to be working with different figures, or is making poor calculations.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.