To: CedarDave
In some ways, this would be far more effective than a stationary chain-link fence.
All kidding aside, the Federal and State governments already control far too much of our land without doing anything productive with it.
14 posted on
08/19/2012 2:56:35 PM PDT by
3Fingas
(Sons and Daughters of Freedom, Committee of Correspondence)
To: 3Fingas
All kidding aside, the Federal and State governments already control far too much of our land without doing anything productive with it.
Agreed, and it ain't all out west. This map isn't high enough resolution to show the growing web of greenways and properties under the control of various land trusts.
Our "republican" governor just announced that they were buying 2000 acres right on the edge of my little town. Its part of $70 million in state and federal funds to buy land and other projects.
34 posted on
08/19/2012 3:31:55 PM PDT by
cripplecreek
(What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
To: 3Fingas
I’m betting the purpose of this is to prevent an effective barrier from being built on that section of the border, “because it would interfere with the migration of the kitties”...and illegal Democrats.
57 posted on
08/19/2012 4:45:00 PM PDT by
Trod Upon
(Obama: Making the Carter malaise look good. Misery Index in 3...2...1)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson