Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cincinatus' Wife
“This is really the fundamental disagreement,” said Garrett Gruener, the founder of Ask.com, who advocates higher taxes for himself and other ultra-wealthy individuals

This is really a topic worthy of discussion. When one is taxed heavier, one can less easily give to charity. I would rather give gladly at a local level than be extorted on a federal level. Plus there is nothing keeping these ultra-wealthy people from paying more taxes. They like to get on television and say I wish I could pay more. 15 minutes of fame whores. nothing more.

2 posted on 08/19/2012 5:59:41 AM PDT by BipolarBob (Biden: "HOPE and CHAINS for all 57 states".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: BipolarBob
"Plus there is nothing keeping these ultra-wealthy people from paying more taxes. They like to get on television and say I wish I could pay more."

You nailed it there. The pious liberals pretend they would pay more taxes, but don't do so, even when able to check the "pay more" box on their IRS forms.

Yet, when faced with someone like Romney who actually gives substantial amounts to charitable institutions which are clearly more effective at charity than the government, they say "it doesn't count".

4 posted on 08/19/2012 6:10:55 AM PDT by norwaypinesavage (Galileo: In science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of one individual)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: BipolarBob

When money is confiscated in the form of taxes, in a conservative administration those funds are to be used for the constitutionally mandated functions of government, or in the case of state and local taxes, for the provision of basic public services. It is when tax dollars are used to redistribute wealth to those who can not or will not earn it themselves that the line is drawn on moral grounds...The choice of who receives this assistance becomes one made by the general consensus as defined by laws that are enacted by a duly elected body, or by fiat when bureaucrats arbitrarily decide the beneficiaries. That is what we face now, and the latter must be banned or we are sunk as a nation.


12 posted on 08/19/2012 6:40:29 AM PDT by Shady (The Tea Party is the Party of the American People, Working and creating wealth in SPITE of OBAMA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: BipolarBob

Garrett Gruener is founder of Ask.com and a co-founder of Alta Partners, a venture capital firm. He was also a candidate for the 2003 California recall special election from the Democratic Party, finishing 28th in a field of 135 candidates with 2,562 votes.

He has been working for more than two decades in the fields of software development, systems engineering and corporate development. In 1982, he founded Virtual Microsystems, a communications software company that was later merged with a larger corporation. He also founded Ask Jeeves, now Ask.Com, an Internet search engine which is now part of IAC.

Garrett specializes in information technology and is on the board of directors of nCircle Network Security, Xelerated and Nanomix, where he also currently serves as acting CEO.

Gruener was one of the candidates to aggressively use the Internet to push his message, and also ran campaign ads in selected television markets.

However, he was concerned about eventual winner Arnold

Schwarzenegger winning and so in the last week of the campaign threw his support to Cruz Bustamante, the primary Democratic candidate. Gruener received $1.07 million in contributions to his committee.

Gruener is a class of ‘76 UCSD Alumus. He lives with his wife, attorney Amy Slater, and their daughter Dakota Gruener, in Berkeley.


14 posted on 08/19/2012 6:48:12 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: BipolarBob
“Taxes are a form a of charity,” said Michael Tanner, a scholar at the Cato Institute who has studied philanthropy, explaining the conservative viewpoint. “If we think of the point of taxes, it’s not to be punitive. We tax people because there’s some use, some public good, for which they’re needed.”

The naivete' shown by this statement is offensive, especially coming from the Cato Institute. Taxes are THE main way the economy is damaged badly enough for the same government that imposes the crushing taxes, to declare even more crushing taxes are needed to take care of the people impoverished by the crushing taxes. For a "scholar" not acknowledge this fundamental self-reinforcing cycle, with fully HALF the population on govenment support, is inexcusable.

26 posted on 08/19/2012 9:02:27 AM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson