Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: suthener

They had their guns out and aimed at him.
Why didn’t they release the dog?


54 posted on 08/18/2012 9:07:26 PM PDT by ZULU (See: http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=D9vQt6IXXaM&hd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: ZULU

because they didn’t want to shoot fido


56 posted on 08/18/2012 9:09:58 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (let me ABOs run loose, lew (or is that lou?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

To: ZULU

“They had their guns out and aimed at him.
Why didn’t they release the dog?”

Of course I can’t answer that. Maybe they really were trying to end it peacefully and the guy started advancing on an officer and there wasn’t time to release the dog. Maybe the guy was standing there with a knife waiting for the dog and they didn’t want their dog to get stabbed.

There are too many armchair quarterbacks on this thread for me. People have the luxury of watching the video 10 times making judgement calls when the police had literally seconds to make their decisions. I am not a police supporter in abuse cases, but as I’ve said 100 times, police are not obligated to get their asses beat, get shot, or get stabbed as a condition of their employment. If you decide to use force against a police officer you should expect overwhelming force in return. That’s just how it works.


91 posted on 08/19/2012 4:23:38 AM PDT by suthener
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson