To: JRandomFreeper
heard the same about Clinton No you did not.
Your sort of "Purity uber alles" "conservative" are the useful idiots of the Democrat propaganda machine. If you refuse to see the assault on the Constitution the last 4 years of 0 have been, your are simply to pig head blind stubborn to be voting.
41 posted on
08/18/2012 3:27:36 PM PDT by
MNJohnnie
(Giving more money to DC to fix the Debt is like giving free drugs to addicts think it will cure them)
To: MNJohnnie
Yes, I did hear the same about Clinton. He was going to put people in FEMA camps... remember black helicopters? Every single election, the GOP tries the scare tactics to get conservatives to vote for their liberal.
BTW, freepers have been asked to lay off the personal attacks over this issue.
/johnny
To: MNJohnnie
If you don’t like what we stand for on FR, just take a freaking hike.
47 posted on
08/18/2012 3:40:16 PM PDT by
Jim Robinson
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
To: MNJohnnie
We are not looking for "purity". We are looking for just a base degree of conservatism in a candidate. It is not too much to ask for. The further left the Dems move, the Repub leadership, their strategists, consultants e.t.c. follow along closely behind. This time they moved right off the plantation. I guess they wanted to keep up with their current opponent in liberalism.
This throwing around of the "purity" label just takes away whatever credibility you have. The Mitt campaign among conservatives has been reduced to hyperbole.
53 posted on
08/18/2012 4:46:14 PM PDT by
Moorings
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson