[dragnet2]

Lets examine this exchange shall we?

"you are just wrong. L.A. and Irving are apx. the same."

Then after seeing the stats and say:

""Violent crime in Irving is about 1/2 of L.A.""

Then you state:

"Like the man said, there are lies, damned lies and statistics."

I responded: Well, this begs the question, are you denying the stats regarding Irving?

Then ya make this statement:

"Since the question does not contain its own answer, it “begs” nothing.

Do you realize what a fool you sound like?

((wow))

[freedumb2003]

>>Do you realize what a fool you sound like?<<

You continue to stand on your stupidity. I tried to help you but you insist on being ignorant, forensically and factually. If you are too stupid to understand what a logical fallacy is, you are probably beyond anyone’s help.

Since you are unable to scroll back, I repeat my questions:

1) In your tables, is Irving listed on the first (leftmost) column? If so, you got some ‘splaining to do.

2) Which of YOUR statistics are you unable to comprehend?

3) Do you understand what forensic analysis means? Do you know what a logical fallacy is?

Knowledge: get it, use it, make it part of your life. Purposeful ignorance is just pathetic.