[pieceofthepuzzle]

I would ask Mr. Benson why he would concentrate on a loosely organized group of Americans, the Tea Party’ that have shown no propensity for violence, and why he would ignore groups like the Black Panthers and the Nation of Islam who have clearly shown a propensity for violence. One of the most recent examples of people threatening to act outside of official channels were the threats made against George Zimmerman. Why concentrate on theoretical scenarios that have no basis in fact, when you have real-life examples to draw from?

[Nip]

IMHO the reason is simple.

The New Black Panther Party and Nation of Islam are Holder’s “people”, the Tea party (in the view of the liberal-progressive-socialist-dimocrat cabal) aren’t.

According to the Rules for radicals, among the first acts to take against a group opposing you is to rob them on any legitimacy they might have through lies and other acts.

Any more questions?