Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Impy; BillyBoy; AuH2ORepublican

That’s not pro-life at all. How many “personally” pro-aborts vote pro-life ? It’s like the marriage issue, I’d rather you be “personally” pro-fudge but vote NO on that abomination than the other way around. It ain’t how you talk, it’s how you vote.


48 posted on 08/14/2012 1:48:22 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (If you like lying Socialist dirtbags, you'll love Slick Willard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: fieldmarshaldj; BillyBoy; AuH2ORepublican

I’d pay to see that.

“I’m personally for gay marriage BUT......” LOL


49 posted on 08/14/2012 1:57:39 AM PDT by Impy (Don't call me red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: fieldmarshaldj; Impy

I had no idea that’s what Hanneman meant by “pro-life” (I only knew that for years he had been attacked by liberals because he supposedly was “anti-choice.” Being only nominally pro-life, but voting pro-abortion, wouldn’t help the cause very much; we’d be better off with a “pro-choice” Congressman who voted against public financing, voted for restrictions, etc. (à la Johnny Isakson, Lynn Jenkins, etc.).


51 posted on 08/14/2012 3:19:46 AM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson