[DoughtyOne]

Officers can issue false statements too. I’m not going to say that’s what is happening here. Once again, we’ll have to wait.

Some people get very angry when they come into contact with officers. This woman may have gone postal on the scene. She was sited for violation of restrictions and rolling through a stop sign. The violation portion is probably what really rubbed her the wrong way. A judge is going to angry over that. She knows it. The cops wouldn’t let her slide. She’s going to get even.

I don’t know if things are worse than they were years ago, but I was a juror earlier this year, and the defendant was lying his ass off. The other jurors bought off on it. His story was very outlandish. It worked.

That sounds like what may be happening here.

She has no recourse on the charges, so she makes as outlandish a story as she can, hoping her portion of the charges will be dismissed.

If she was resistant and abusive during the traffic stop, a supervisor would probably be called in. A female office may have been too, to lend a modicum of female perspective to the situation, a defensive mechanism.

I won’t be surprised at all to see others at the scene.

[presently no screen name]

Get angry when in contact with the police? TRY THIS..

The policeman, the lawsuit says, then pulled her over, approached with his gun drawn and put Tarantino in handcuffs while her two small children — ages one and four — watched...

Over the next two hours, five other policemen arrived, including a female officer, and Tarantino was “frisked and strip searched twice at the side of the busy road, in plain view of passers by.” During one of these searches, the female officer “forcibly removed” the tampon...

FOR WHAT - rolling through a STOP sign? Don't you have to in order to look both ways if their in any obstruction?

[M-cubed]

The other jurors bought off on it. His story was very outlandish. It worked. <<

and you were the ONLY smart SOB on the jury!....I wanna have your attitude and be on your jury for your conviction of J-walking!....Don't tell me you've never done it!..........*G*

[Oztrich Boy]

If she was resistant and abusive during the traffic stop, a supervisor would probably be called in. A female office may have been too, to lend a modicum of female perspective to the situation, a defensive mechanism.

I won’t be surprised at all to see others at the scene.

Well that explains 3 the the cops, what about the other 3?

For her case 3 are as good as 6, so I assume she is telling the truth when she says 6. Why so many?

If she was resistant and abusive during the traffic stop, she would have been charged with resisting arrest, assaulting police, damage to county property, terrorism er.al.

But no

This woman may have gone postal on the scene. She was sited for violation of restrictions and rolling through a stop sign.

Do you realize how stupid that sounds?

The violation portion is probably what really rubbed her the wrong way. A judge is going to angry over that. She knows it. The cops wouldn’t let her slide.

It wouldn't come before a judge. She wasn't charged. They didn't even include the rolling though the stop sign. They did let it slide, just found a minimim cite "We screwed up. count yourself lucky, don't make waves. Or.."