Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lawsuit: Cops ‘forcibly removed’ tampon from mother during traffic stop
dailycaller.com ^ | 8/10/12 | Steven Nelson

Posted on 08/10/2012 7:08:35 PM PDT by Albion Wilde

A Florida woman claims that police pulled her over for a minor traffic infraction, strip searched her on the side of the road, and “forcibly removed” a tampon that she was wearing....

The woman... filed a lawsuit against the Citrus County government, Sheriff Jeffrey Dawsey and six unknown officers last week seeking damages....

The policeman, the lawsuit says, then pulled her over, approached with his gun drawn and put Tarantino in handcuffs while her two small children — ages one and four — watched...

Over the next two hours, five other policemen arrived, including a female officer, and Tarantino was “frisked and strip searched twice at the side of the busy road, in plain view of passers by.” During one of these searches, the female officer “forcibly removed” the tampon...

(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: citruscounty; copsoutofcontrol; faciststate; stripsearch
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-120 next last
To: Albion Wilde

They should string those cops up.


61 posted on 08/10/2012 9:00:21 PM PDT by andyk (Go Juan Pablo!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Albion Wilde

A Florida woman claims

Don’t be so quick to accept “claims” as the gospel truth. May be, may not be true


62 posted on 08/10/2012 9:01:30 PM PDT by Figment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Albion Wilde

This doesn’t smell right from a simple logic angle. I can’t imagine a supervisor allowing a half-dozen patrol officers to be offline for two hours over a traffic stop. And since when are strip-searches conducted on the side of the road? And I find it hard to believe that you could get six cops who were all stupid enough to think this was a good idea, in the same place at the same time.

That being said, I can’t totally dismiss it. The truth will out.


63 posted on 08/10/2012 9:03:13 PM PDT by PLMerite (Shut the Beyotch Down! Burn, baby, burn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

Looks like someone who has just been abused by her own government.


64 posted on 08/10/2012 9:03:47 PM PDT by andyk (Go Juan Pablo!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: prof.h.mandingo

Did she have a string tied to it?


65 posted on 08/10/2012 9:06:26 PM PDT by Delta 21 (Oh Crap !! Did I say that out loud ??!??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Mich Patriot

I no longer support any COPS. Too much too many times. F em all.


66 posted on 08/10/2012 9:12:19 PM PDT by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

You believe, at face value, the perps allegation? I hope you don’t get to jury duty very often


67 posted on 08/10/2012 9:21:59 PM PDT by Figment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Delta 21

No string. But we were impressed at what you could fit in there. Although an AK would have been “really” impressive.


68 posted on 08/10/2012 9:23:35 PM PDT by prof.h.mandingo (Buck v. Bell (1927) An idea whose time has come (for extreme liberalism))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

It didn’t used to happen.

Why are you so sure it happened in this case. I’m not one to jump to conclusions on such evidence as what a lawyer claims in a lawsuit. I’ll bet right now though it is total BS


69 posted on 08/10/2012 9:26:19 PM PDT by Figment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
What the hell? She's just been assaulted by the police, in front of her kids and she's suppose to look glamorous?
70 posted on 08/10/2012 9:28:39 PM PDT by dragonblustar (Allah Ain't So Akbar!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
The other jurors bought off on it. His story was very outlandish. It worked. <<

and you were the ONLY smart SOB on the jury!....I wanna have your attitude and be on your jury for your conviction of J-walking!....Don't tell me you've never done it!..........*G*

71 posted on 08/10/2012 9:30:26 PM PDT by M-cubed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

where were the other 5 cops assigned at that time.

What is the problem with there being 6 cops? That would mean 6 cameras to back up the perp or the cops. Cops where I live are one to a car and there are never less than 2. It’s called safety


72 posted on 08/10/2012 9:38:48 PM PDT by Figment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

That doesn’t look much like a mug shot. Probably taken for the story that is a year old


73 posted on 08/10/2012 9:42:03 PM PDT by Figment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

We’ve heard both preliminary stories now. It will be interesting to see what comes of this. Are the officers going down or is this another Twana Brawley? (sp?) We’ll see.


74 posted on 08/10/2012 9:45:30 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Nope 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
If she was resistant and abusive during the traffic stop, a supervisor would probably be called in. A female office may have been too, to lend a modicum of female perspective to the situation, a defensive mechanism.

I won’t be surprised at all to see others at the scene.

Well that explains 3 the the cops, what about the other 3?

For her case 3 are as good as 6, so I assume she is telling the truth when she says 6. Why so many?

If she was resistant and abusive during the traffic stop, she would have been charged with resisting arrest, assaulting police, damage to county property, terrorism er.al.

But no

This woman may have gone postal on the scene. She was sited for violation of restrictions and rolling through a stop sign.
Do you realize how stupid that sounds?
The violation portion is probably what really rubbed her the wrong way. A judge is going to angry over that. She knows it. The cops wouldn’t let her slide.
It wouldn't come before a judge. She wasn't charged. They didn't even include the rolling though the stop sign. They did let it slide, just found a minimim cite "We screwed up. count yourself lucky, don't make waves. Or.."
75 posted on 08/10/2012 9:45:54 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (Literals will believe anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
GEEEEEEEEEZ!....you're the smartest sum-a-bitch I've ever seen on here!....(Go back and read your statement)...If I stopped you, and had known what type of things you said prior to this....

Sadly,yes....Id have taken you behind the cruiser and....and...and.. made u tell me all the unfortunate things you'd been involved it prior to this!... (that's my statement to the investigating officials....how u kicked your own ass is a mystery to me!)

76 posted on 08/10/2012 9:47:49 PM PDT by M-cubed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Albion Wilde
They sexually abused her and terrorized her toddler and infant. But at least they didn't shoot her dog.

No, she CLAIMS they did it. Huge, huge difference.

77 posted on 08/10/2012 9:52:55 PM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dragonblustar

What the hell? She’s just been assaulted by the police, in front of her kids and she’s suppose to look glamorous?

That wasn’t a mug shot. She wasn’t arrested


78 posted on 08/10/2012 9:57:23 PM PDT by Figment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: dragonblustar
What the hell? She's just been assaulted by the police, in front of her kids and she's suppose to look glamorous?

No, she CLAIMS this happened. It may have happened, or it may not have happened.

It would be stupid for any of us to assume we know what happened here, based on allegations.

79 posted on 08/10/2012 9:59:21 PM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Everyone posting on this thread needs to go back to the link and read the lawsuit. It all hinges on the police handbook doesn’t spell out procedures for the claims made. I’m calling it BS


80 posted on 08/10/2012 10:03:08 PM PDT by Figment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-120 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson