Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: super7man
Nonetheless, I’m pressing forward with my 600MW version.

I sure hope you have better success than the cold fusion guys have had. More than two decades, and so far, no demonstrable device.
32 posted on 08/09/2012 9:25:47 AM PDT by ZX12R (FUBO GTFO 2012 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: ZX12R
More than two decades, and so far, no demonstrable device.

That's good news, I'm neck-n-neck with 'em and I've only been working on it for 30 minutes.

I'm good.

33 posted on 08/09/2012 9:29:34 AM PDT by super7man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: ZX12R
"I sure hope you have better success than the cold fusion guys have had. More than two decades, and so far, no demonstrable device. "

Well, the "cold fusion" guys are already way ahead of the "hot fusion" crowd, which has had half a century, $250 billion, and has yet to produce a single over-unity device.

And despite your assertions, there have been a number of "demonstrable devices", especially recently, that have demonstrated "over-unity" performance. Celani's is running NOW on the exhibit floor of NIWEEK, and Schwartz's "Nanor" device has been running for months at MIT. And there are others.

36 posted on 08/09/2012 2:46:45 PM PDT by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson