Posted on 08/07/2012 6:36:10 AM PDT by xzins
A spokesperson for Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney has advised that the former Massachusetts governor disagrees with the Boy Scouts current policy prohibiting open homosexuals from serving as members and leaders.
According to The Associated Press, Romney spokeswoman Andrea Saul told the news outlet in an email that Romney still stands by his beliefs that homosexual men should be able to serve in the organization. She specifically noted that Romney had outlined his views in 1994 during a political debate, and that his stance has not changed.
I support the right of the Boy Scouts of America to decide what it wants to do on that issue, Romney stated during the debate. I feel that all people should be able to participate in the Boy Scouts regardless of their sexual orientation.
As previously reported, last month, the Boy Scouts of America issued a statement reaffirming its policy prohibiting open homosexuals from joining the organization.
The committees work and conclusion is that this policy reflects the beliefs and perspectives of the BSAs members, thereby allowing Scouting to remain focused on its mission and the work it is doing to serve more youth, the statement said. The review included forthright and candid conversation and extensive research and evaluations both from within Scouting and from outside of the organization.
The decision to reiterate and reaffirm the Scouts current policy followed two years of deliberations from an eleven-member committee comprised of Boy Scout executives and other volunteers who represented a diversity of perspectives and opinions.
When all was said and done, the committee concluded that the restriction served as the best policy for the Boy Scouts.
The current policy reads, While the BSA does not proactively inquire about the sexual orientation of employees, volunteers, or members, we do not grant membership to individuals who are open or avowed homosexuals or who engage in behavior that would become a distraction to the mission of the BSA.
Mitt Romney also recently reiterated his support for homosexual adoption. This past May, in an interview with Neil Cavuto of Fox News, he explained that while he is against the concept of homosexual marriage, he does believe that homosexual couples should be able to adopt children.
[I]f two people of the same gender want to live together, want to have a loving relationship, or even to adopt a child, in my state, individuals of the same sex were able to adopt children. In my view, thats something that people have a right to do, Romney outlined. But, to call that marriage is something that in my view is a departure from the real meaning of that word.
He had first outlined his position on the matter in 1996 while talking to CNNs Wolf Blitzer.
Well, they are able to adopt children, he said. Im not going to change that.
Prior to Saul serving as Romneys press secretary, Richard Grenell, an open homosexual, filled the position.
Related Stories:
But it helps Soetoro and isn’t that the goal?
Thank you..I appreciate the correction of false information.
Vallejo , California -- 1 in 16 homes in foreclosure
Tampa , Florida -- 1 in 20 homes in foreclosure
Stockton , California -- 1 in 14 homes in foreclosure
Sacramento , California -- 1 in 19 homes in foreclosure
Riverside , California -- 1 of 14 homes in foreclosure
Reno , Nevada -- 1 in 16 homes in foreclosure
Phoenix , Arizona -- 1 in 14 homes in foreclosure
Orlando , Florida -- 1 in 15 homes in foreclosure
Naples , Florida -- 1 in 18 homes in foreclosure
Miami , Florida -- 1 in 14 homes in foreclosure
Las Vegas , Nevada -- 1 in 9 homes in foreclosure
Deltona , Florida -- 1 in 17 homes in foreclosure
Cape Coral , Florida -- 1 in 12 homes in foreclosure
Boise , Idaho -- 1 in 21 homes in foreclosure
Bakersfield , California -- 1 in 17 homes in foreclosure
Sarasota , Florida -- 1 in 21 homes in foreclosure
USA -- 1 in 46 homes in foreclosure
And some people want to give him another 4 years!!
Have you ever wondered about how a tribal chieftan, Abraham, was able to overcome an army that the cities of the plains were defeated by?
They were as you said, “more interested in their prosperity than that they were living in a moral sewer.” They were more interested in their pleasures than in their protection.
They were easily overcome...probably because they sacrificed security on the altar of sexuality. So, they ended up losing their prosperity to an army that should not have been able to defeat them.
And some nomad and his shepherds, who were living a life they scraped out in the hills, but with attention to the demands of God, were able to overcome an army that had taken down the “defended” cities.
Perhaps a TribalPrincess2U will be able to hear about a tribal chieftain.
Well said, Sister FReeper.
And the Mexican homo social corporatist is not a significant degree better.
Seriously, moji, they both are very, very bad.
The same ol' mantra we heard back in '96 with Clinton, and even heard in 2008 with Obama, and again in 2010 with regard to mid-terms being prevented because Obama would find some pretense to declare National State of Emerency.
American can and WILL survive Obama's re-election, especially if he is re-elected on a piss-poor plurality. Likewise, conservatism could and will survive a Romney election if he is elected on a piss-poor plurality. That's why I'm praying for -- and voting for -- a plurality. I'm voting third party.
You, on the other hand, are allowing hysteria to manipulate you into voting to make liberalism stronger in the Republican party.
I don’t and we won’t. With no future election for him, the next 4 years will make the first 4 pale in comparison.
Conservatives are being duped once again.
I think you are wrong. The Marxist Kenyan will lose Florida, FOR SURE! I think he will lose in November.
FACT:
Governor Romney, when he was a Governor, was not supportive of LGBT rights including trying to remove funding for the Governors Committee of LGBT Youth, Chrisler said. He has been consistently that way as governor and now running as president he is moving even more to the right because he is a part of a party thats pushing their candidates farther to the edge.
http://www.golocalworcester.com/politics/21185/
No one is asking you to vote for the guy. Just providing the facts. :-)
Forked tongue much?
You're most welcome. :-)
He is EVIl. He needs 4 more years to "fundamentally TRANSFORM the Unite Stares of America".
You are underestimating the zombie democrats.
I know old people who will say never never never and then vote for obama because he is a democrat and they want “government out of social security.” (yes those of the “greatest generation” can be that stupid)
I voted for Newt. I wanted Sarah,she didn’t run. Romney is not even 1/100th as bad as the Kenyan. I want the economy to improve and FR makes it all about social issues. If the economy tanks, the deviant social issues will take over. I’m voting for Romney. I held my nose and voted for McCain for much less reason that I have now to hold my nose and vote. I will vote ABO.
When I listened to those words, I was amazed too, AW.
Heard them with my own ears. Couldn’t believe it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.