>> So...you don’t think that out of the MILLIONS of the documented transactions
You are such a stubborn girl!
THE ONLY “transactions” to which this rider applies is P-O-L-I-C-E executing forcible entry into a residence.
Get it? Let me spell it out again: P-O-L-I-C-E.
There are NOT!!!! do you understand? NOT ten million P-O-L-I-C-E forced entries into houses in the US.
Yet there are WAY more than a “handful” of these incidents wherein the P-O-L-I-C-E enter the WRONG house.
THAT is the ratio YOU first put forth. Get it? Here’s the math:
WRONGFUL P-O-L-I-C-E forced entries into a residence
-————————————————————— (divided by)
ALL P-O-L-I-C-E forced entries into a residence.
THAT number is MUCH greater than the one in ten million (.00001%) you based your argument on! COP A CLUE!!
STOP BARFING OUT STUPID NUMBERS ABOUT EVERY PROPERTY CRIME. THEY ARE MEANINGLESS. You’re embarrassing yourself.
“THE ONLY “transactions” to which this rider applies is P-O-L-I-C-E executing forcible entry into a residence.”
REALLY?
Where does it say that? Anyone?
What it says is that they can start shooting if they THINK there is a threat of violence. Are you stupid, is that why this doesn’t make sense to you? If there were that many crimes REPORTED, there were many more committed (a number your cohorts thought to be inflated) so...just imagine how many home visits (forced or otherwise) are made each year. And these are the ones that are called in. How many of those will dictate how many chances there will be for the random set-up, inadvertent call, wrong address, high as a kite respondent and, yes, the cowboy cop who is already expecting the worst or shouldn’t be out there. There are millions of opportunities and the best anyone could come up with was a ten year mish mash of things that was, I dare to say it, TINY compared to the opportunities that something real wrong could down. As for embarrassing myself, the only embarrassment I feel is that I thought you had a a little better comprehension level. Sorry.