To: aruanan
I would think that if they find “life”, they can say it is all throughout the universe. All it needs is the proper enviorment and life will develop. That would mean in there eyes that God did not create life.
71 posted on
08/06/2012 6:45:39 AM PDT by
winodog
To: winodog
I would think that if they find life, they can say it is all throughout the universe. All it needs is the proper enviorment and life will develop. That would mean in there eyes that God did not create life.
Science and discovery are the unveiling of God's creation. There is no need to fear it. But it is okay to question conclusions based on it.
81 posted on
08/06/2012 7:10:32 AM PDT by
ZX12R
(FUBO GTFO 2012 !)
To: winodog
I would think that if they find life, they can say it is all throughout the universe. All it needs is the proper enviorment and life will develop. That would mean in there eyes that God did not create life.
Of course, they would, as unscientific as they are. They try to argue the same conclusion from contradictory sets of premises: A. We're all alone in the universe. This shows we're a fluke. If there were really an all-powerful God why would he have created life in just this one place? Therefore, there is no God. B. We find life everywhere. It can happen just as easily as the universe itself can happen. It's nothing special. So much for man being the crown of creation. Therefore, there is no God.
118 posted on
08/06/2012 3:15:14 PM PDT by
aruanan
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson