Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Finny

Yet, by your actions, you will allow the chief advocate of those policies to continue for another 4 years. Think of the possibilities when one doesn’t have to worry about reelection.

Once again, where’s your alternative?

Who needs Democrats when we are intent on destroying ourselves.

/enjoy the rest of this thread. I’m heading over to NASA.gov to follow Curiosity.


191 posted on 08/05/2012 8:28:28 PM PDT by MDspinboyredux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies ]


To: MDspinboyredux
And by your actions, you would put another chief advocate of all those policies in the White House for EIGHT years and pin a Republican button on his lapel!

Good Grief!!!

You really need to bone up on Romney's RECORD. His ACTIONS, his POLITICS IN PRACTICE.

My alternative is to vote for a plurality in order to deny a popular mandate to whichever "chief advocate of all those policies" gets the White House. The last time a liberal won the presidency on a plurality, he was impeached; the time before, he was forced to move right by the Republican Revolution.

Frankly, my alternative is a hell of a lot better risk than yours. Risk is the price you pay for opportunity.

278 posted on 08/06/2012 2:58:09 AM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson