Things would have turned out a lot different if that pastor would have opened a mosque.
1 posted on
08/05/2012 9:40:50 AM PDT by
Zakeet
To: Zakeet
2 posted on
08/05/2012 9:43:04 AM PDT by
TEXOKIE
(Nobody made a greater mistake than he who did nothing because he could do only a little. EdmondBurke)
To: Zakeet
No, he wasn’t jailed for having bible studies in his home.
False alert.
IIRC this is the guy who has tons of cars parking, traffic, and it’s often in a neighborhood for homes. It’s not the bible studies getting him in trouble, it’s the traffic and noise in a neighborhood.
I’m not reading the article though - maybe it’s a different guy. lol
3 posted on
08/05/2012 9:44:03 AM PDT by
Principled
(Vote Romney to stop Obama. Vote for conservative Reps and Senators to stop Romney. [ZET 7/30/12])
To: Zakeet
This is not as it appears. 60+ of his neighbors signed a petition to have him stop holding the studies due to traffic concerns etc.
4 posted on
08/05/2012 9:55:13 AM PDT by
trailhkr1
To: Zakeet
As much as I detest overreaching bureaucracy at all levels, I have to reject this attempt at misdirection.
The idiot is jailed for violating zoning laws and inconveniencing his neighbors.
There may not be a civilized way to change that, since it is not likely that the attempt will produce sympathetic support.
I would not want a neighbor setting up a church or a mosque next door, no matter how well-intentioned.
Unconscious nuts also come in religious garb.
7 posted on
08/05/2012 9:57:05 AM PDT by
publius911
(Formerly Publius 6961, formerly jennsdad)
To: Zakeet
I don't think it's physically possible for those girls to be smiling any bigger.
9 posted on
08/05/2012 10:09:14 AM PDT by
Tex-Con-Man
(T. Coddington Van Voorhees VII 2012 - "Together, I Shall Ride You To Victory")
To: Zakeet
It looks like everyone here has gotten the true story.
He was just being a very bad, troublesome, neighbor and the rest finally had had enough.
11 posted on
08/05/2012 10:14:59 AM PDT by
Balding_Eagle
(Liberals, at their core, are aggressive & dangerous to everyone around them,)
To: Zakeet
There are many house churches springing up throughout the nation. Are these gatherings any different than people hosting large parties in their homes (some like to party every week), a tupperware-type party, an organizational meeting, or a reception for a political candidate?
To: All
14 posted on
08/05/2012 10:30:38 AM PDT by
musicman
(Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
To: Zakeet
No,not for Bible Study.....but for trying to claim it as exempt status as a church....
24 posted on
08/05/2012 12:18:21 PM PDT by
rxtn41
To: Zakeet
" . . . hosted Bible sessions for as many 80 people on his 4-acre property . . . " It's got to be very easy to host 80 friends and family members on four (4 !) acres without bothering neighbors, even with their cars.
I own 0.5 acre in a small town and have had forty people at a time with very few cars on the street.
Something is very wrong here, either in the reporting or in the attitude of the city.
To: Zakeet
What part of EIGHTY PEOPLE don’t you understand?
32 posted on
08/05/2012 4:03:09 PM PDT by
newzjunkey
(Pontius Pilate 'voters' are arrogant, delusional, lilly-livered collaborators.)
To: Zakeet
All zoning and building codes that restrict “the free exercise thereof” are obviously unconstitutional.
34 posted on
08/05/2012 4:10:53 PM PDT by
editor-surveyor
(Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they were.)
To: Zakeet
>> “The case is about the building that is used for regular assembly does not meet construction and fire code requirements for assembly” <<
.
Vomit!
.
35 posted on
08/05/2012 4:13:23 PM PDT by
editor-surveyor
(Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they were.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson