Oh, a “real Christian” never follows the face of the story?
So sorry to disappoint you that a summary is not a commentary. I’m sure to you a summary would pass the literal story by and instead would be a mini commentary about what a wonderful picture of Jesus Christ the story of Job is. But I believe words have literal meanings. Summaries are summaries; commentaries are commentaries. I missed nothing by leaving Christology out of the summary. It is because I never presumed to provide a commentary.
I gave an accurate summary. I also gave interpretation. I distinguished the two.
You refuse all interpretation and only give commentary, or so you claim. Of course, insisting that no commentary is ever legitimate is itself to choose a side in interpretation issues.
But continue in your stubborn on your purity.