I gave an accurate summary. I also gave interpretation. I distinguished the two.
You refuse all interpretation and only give commentary, or so you claim. Of course, insisting that no commentary is ever legitimate is itself to choose a side in interpretation issues.
But continue in your stubborn on your purity.
What a wondrous set of straw men. Ever consider donating them to a museum?
A summary covers the face story. You act all aghast that it does not also cover the Christological hints of the face story. Some passages in Old Testament books carry Christology on their face. Job serves rather as an imperfect analogy to the eternal saga of Jesus Christ (no mortal’s experience could exactly parallel that of the perfect Christ); and one face lesson is not to be ignorant of spiritual warfare, a lesson that carries over directly into the practice of Christianity.