Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HiTech RedNeck

I gave an accurate summary: Job is innocent. His friends’ theology requires that his suffering be punishment for sin. He protests that it is not, begs God to explain himself. He refuses to blame God, judge God. The final faith affirmation ties suffering to redemption.

To say that it only hints at innocent suffering is to miss the main point of the book. If Job were guilty rather than innocent, he’d have his answer. Precisely because he’s righteous, yet suffering, is the central issue, not merely a hint.

Did you read the same book I read?

When combined with Isaiah 53 it is an important part of the OT preparation for the Christian message of redemptive suffering.


22 posted on 08/05/2012 5:55:22 PM PDT by Houghton M.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Houghton M.
You are looking for Christological connotation. I am looking at denotation. By the way Isaiah 53 does have Christological denotation. Smart aleckiness does not behoove godliness.
23 posted on 08/05/2012 7:39:59 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (let me ABOs run loose, lew (or is that lou?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson