I mentioned Christologlical implications. That’s simply the way Christians view the OT.
But the summary I gave of the book itself is accurate and the point.
I’m the one who said Isaiah 53 has Christological implications. No need to school me on that, as if you caught me in a contradiction.
You have not accurately read and summarized what I wrote. That’s not being smart-alecky. It’s an observation of what you’ve been doing from your initial response.