I show you a Monopoly $10 bill and ask you if the monetary amount on that bill matches the monetary amount on the bill you have in your pocket. You say yes.
According to your logic, both pieces of paper have just been certified to be worth $10 just because they match - even though both could be Monopoly money.
Now suppose that somebody else had already asked you to verify that you had a legal $10 bill in your pocket. You were legally required to verify that fact if it was true, and you would not verify it.
But you would verify that the monetary amount on a Monopoly $10 bill matches the monetary amount of the bill in your pocket.
It’s clear that what’s in your pocket is not a legal $10 bill, so it doesn’t matter what matches it.
If that’s a long winded way of saying Onaka/Hawaii DOH are lying when they confirmed that Obama posted a certified copy of his Birth Certificate on the Whitehouse website and then, subsequently, verified (in a legal deposition) that the data it contained was the same as the data they hold in their archives, then you’ve got a problem because every court on the land will consider it prima facie evidence that his birth records are genuine and you’ve got nothing that will stand up in court as evidence against it.