Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/02/2012 3:56:48 PM PDT by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: EveningStar

The media would have us believe that his signature is required.


2 posted on 08/02/2012 4:07:37 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th (We have met the enemy and he is us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EveningStar
While I have no use for WBC and would gladly spend some time in the pokey for punching one or more out... I don't think Congress needs to try to limit 1st Amendment rights.

/johnny

3 posted on 08/02/2012 4:08:38 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EveningStar

the WBC and the left have won this fight with the passage of this new law. It will gradually be expanded to include other forms of protest that some do not like.


6 posted on 08/02/2012 5:34:44 PM PDT by stockpirate (Slaves to the collective! SCOTUS is just as corrupt as congress. IMPEACH ROBERTS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson