Posted on 08/01/2012 9:00:36 AM PDT by Milagros
Pakistani Owner of Swanky Santa Monica Hotel: "Get the [expletive] Jews out of my Pool" By: Lori Lowenthal Marcus Published: July 30th, 2012 Latest update: July 31st, 2012
An upscale hotel on a Santa Monica, California, beach is an odd place to be singled out from a crowd and removed because you are Jewish, but that's what happened to 18 young professionals who are telling their story to a jury in a discrimination trial taking place in Santa Monica Superior Court this week.
Ari Ryan is the grandson of a Ukranian Jew who lost most of his family in the Holocaust and narrowly escaped death at the hands of the Nazis. Ryan's grandfather moved to Israel in 1942 and served as a captain in the Israel Defense Forces.
Seventy years later Ryan says he got a small taste of what his grandfather lived through, but rather than in the forests of the Ukraine, it took place at an upscale hotel in Santa Monica. Ryan and more than a dozen others have brought a lawsuit alleging anti-Semitic discrimination against them by a multi-millionaire Muslim American hotel owner.
Two years ago Ryan and other twenty- and thirty-something Jews planned to raise money to send children of fallen IDF soldiers to camp with a charity event at the Hotel Shangri-La in Santa Monica, California.
On the morning of July 11, 2010, Ryan and others arrived at the hotel and began setting up Friends of the IDF banners, literature and piles of shirts for the event guests.
But the event was aborted after, according to one employee's sworn testimony, the hotel's owner told staff members, "Get the [expletive deleted] Jews out of my pool." Then the hotel security and other employees began removing the materials and ordering the guests to leave.
Ryan said, "Anyone wearing a blue wristband," which identified them as being with the Friends of the IDF, "was asked to get out of the swimming pool and the hot tub." In fact, no one who was identifiable as Jewish was so much as "allowed to dip their feet in the water."
Tehmina (Tamie) Adaya, a Pakistani-American Muslim, is the owner of the Shangri-La. Her father, Ahmad Adaya, was a founding partner of the California real estate company IDS Real Estate Group. He also was a founder and benefactor of the New Horizon School for Muslim religious education in Southern California.
The father bought the Shangri-La Hotel in the 1980‘s and the daughter took it over in 2004, investing $30 million to renovate the property into a design award-winning opulent destination. In addition to the hotel, Adaya runs an upscale artist collective called the Crown Jewels which she blogs about at her site "Culture Shock to Culture Architect."
In the cross-complaint she initially filed, Adaya claimed Ryan and his friends were trespassing on the Shangri-La property and became unruly.
"Not so," said James Turken, managing partner of the California office of the DC-based law firm Dickstein, Shapiro, attorney for the plaintiffs. He explained that Adaya withdrew her complaint after he interviewed her, under oath, and she was unable to substantiate any of the allegations she had made.
Turken told The Jewish Press that witnesses will testify that, in addition to cursing the Jews and yelling at her staff to remove them from the pool, Adaya was heard saying, "my family will disown me," and that her "investors will be furious," if the plaintiffs remained on site.
The defense claims there was no discrimination and that, instead, the promoters of the event had failed to properly schedule the event with the hotel, and therefore they were trespassing.
According to Turken, however, all the necessary arrangements had been made in advance, as evidenced by the initial assistance provided by the Shangri-La employees, which included putting up a rope and stanchions and a check-in table. What's more, he said, the day before the event "the head of hotel security gave a briefing to the staff to prepare them for the crowd of 150 that were expected to attend."
The removal from the pool of Jews who were wearing Jewish-identified wristbands evokes a similar selection process of seventy years ago. Ryan, recalling his grandfather's legacy, said "I felt the weight of standing up to what he had to live through."
The plaintiffs are seeking $ 1 million from Adaya and the Shangri-La Hotel for emotional distress, attorneys' fees and other statutory damages. http://www.jewishpress.com/news/pakistani-owner-of-swanky-santa-monica-hotel-get-the-expletive-jews-out-of-my-pool/2012/07/30/
You are correct that breach of contract is a different matter. I was speaking of government enforced laws on discrimination.
The part about a private business losing rights by opening its doors to the public, however, is incorrect. It is still a private business, and it ought to be able to accept or reject any customer for any reason, even if that reason is distasteful to the rest of us. I guess the only reason business can use now is if the person isn’t wearing shoes or a shirt. They do not have to let anyone and everyone in their place of business, though, and can ask people to leave the premises. That is not against the law unless the person claims it was a case of racial discrimination. Next, will be sexual orientation, and we will see where that leads.
I understand why people are upset that anyone would treat people this way, but do you not see that the government is using this to limit freedom? If you want to rent a room in your house, you may not have a choice to refuse anyone if the government says that you are discriminating against him in some way. That is government running roughshod over your rights.
Again, check out what Walter Williams and Thomas Sowell have to say on the subject.
Perhaps the 14th Amendment has been used to supersede the freedom of association clause, but as I understand it, the 14th Amendment applies only to discrimination by government. It guarantees equal protection under the law, which is as it should be. It does not say anything about individuals, clubs, or private business. Well, I don’t think it does anyway. I’m no legal scholar. :-)
I’ve some sympathy for your position, however there is a distinction between a private business, as in privately owned, which you’re referring to, and a business, possibly privately owned which offers it’s services to the public. If you open a bar, privately owned, and the law says you can’t serve anyone under 21, you can’t. If you can’t serve an inebriant, you can’t. And there are similar laws that require you to serve people without discrimination based on race, gender, religion etc. IMO, kind of an academic issue, I’m not sure it’s something that needs to be changed. The option of a private venue is there, what’s missing is the demand
So, what job has the Pakistani hotel owner been offered in the Obama campaign machine?
Thanks Milagros.
There's a lot going on under the radar in this country in regards to Islam.
Leni
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.