You need to answer the question:
Why don't these people agree with you?
Rush Limbaugh? NO
Hannity? NO
Levin? NO
Fred Thompson? NO
Beck? NO
Any member of Congress? NO
Any sitting Judge? NO
Landmark Legal Foundation? NO
American Center for Law and Justice? NO
Jay Sekulow? NO
Newt Gingrich? NO
Rick Santorum? NO
Herman Cain? NO
Americans for Prosperity? NO
The NRA? NO
National Right to Life Committee? NO
None of the groups or individuals, above, agree with your crackpot interpretations of the law.
They are all strong conservatives, as am I.
You are wrong.
You are alone.
Well.... according to Lawrence Sellin, one of the candidates for the R nomination said it’s not being addressed because it goes far, far deeper than anybody knows. IOW, it is too serious an issue to touch. Kinda worthy of mockery for the same reason that a ticking time bomb is worthy of mockery, or a crazy man shooting a gun in a theater... really crazy for people to address it, ya know...
And according to Mike Zullo, after conducting an investigation (and there are other sources as well, including probably at least one of the people you mentioned from “conservative” media), the media people won’t touch it because they’ve been told that their careers would be over and they and their families’ lives are questionable. That tends to dampen a person’s willingness to stick their neck out... Rush Limbaugh having a bomb threat on the same day that Andrew Breitbart hit the ground - which was on the same day as Arpaio revealed at a press conference that he would be starting a criminal investigation of forgery and fraud - might have something to do with his silence. Beck left Fox because Fox wouldn’t protect his under-staffers from death threats they received, beginning with this issue and extending on to other subjects as well (see, appeasing the beast doesn’t stop him but only emboldens him).
I could go on and on but I think you get the picture.
The judges... well, we’ve got two sharia rulings out of this so far (one in GA and one in NJ) (ruling by “judge’s knowledge” rather than by any evidence whatsoever) so you tell me what’s their deal. Are you going to say nothing is wrong when judges resort to sharia rulings on this issue? Are you going to appeal to their authority as being the end of the matter, in the classic logical fallacy of “arguing from authority”?
Now you tell me why Sheriff Joe is on this issue, and Larry Klayman, and General Paul Vallely, and Lt Col Terry Lakin, and Lord Christopher Monckton.... and I could go on but I think you get the picture. And don’t even bother to do the “No True Scotsman” logical fallacy because we’re not gonna buy it.
I realize you are talking about “crackpot interpretations of the law”, but I think you really mean the whole eligibility issue since I’ve seen you ridicule the whole issue and why would the National Right to Life, NRA, Rush Limbaugh, etc be experts on Constitutional law regarding the definition of “natural born citizen”?
The taunt “You are alone” sounds very, very familiar in a Biblical sense. That sentiment has been used before...
Why don't these people agree with you?
Rush Limbaugh? NO Hannity? NO Levin? NO Fred Thompson? NO Beck? NO Any member of Congress? NO Any sitting Judge? NO Landmark Legal Foundation? NO American Center for Law and Justice? NO Jay Sekulow? NO Newt Gingrich? NO Rick Santorum? NO Herman Cain? NO Americans for Prosperity? NO The NRA? NO National Right to Life Committee? NO
None of the groups or individuals, above, agree with your crackpot interpretations of the law.
Intelligent, educated people would not be proud of the fact that they are arguing a fallacy.
You are apparently so ignorant that you don't even realize it. My recollection of you is that you don't have any arguments that are NOT logical fallacies. Your other favorite argument is THIS FALLACY.
You really should wait till you grow up and learn stuff before you start opining in your ignorance. I perceive you have nothing worthwhile to espouse.