Posted on 07/29/2012 7:38:46 AM PDT by dirtboy
Dick Cheney has some advice for Mitt Romney on choosing a running mate: Don't pick another Sarah Palin.
In his first interview since receiving a heart transplant in March, Cheney told ABC News, that John McCain's decision to pick Palin as his running mate in 2008 was "a mistake" - one that it is important from Romney not to repeat.
It's subject on which Cheney has some unique experience. He helped Presidents Gerald Ford and George W. Bush lead their vice presidential searches and, of course, served as vice president for eight years. He's also privately offered some advice to both Romney and Beth Myers, who is leading Romney's search for a runningmate, on the process.
Cheney would not comment on what he told Romney and Myers, but he was harsh in his assessment of McCain's decision to pick Palin.
"That one," Cheney said, "I don't think was well handled."
"The test to get on that small list has to be, 'Is this person capable of being president of the United States?'"
Cheney believes Sarah Palin failed that test.
"I like Governor Palin. I've met her. I know her. She - attractive candidate. But based on her background, she'd only been governor for, what, two years. I don't think she passed that test
of being ready to take over. And I think that was a mistake."
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
Now I’m quaking in my boots. What are ya gonna’ do, shake your cane at me?
Ya, but apparently that takes a degree of experience and skill.
Ya young whippersnapper, I’ll dance on your grave! lol
Don’t take checks you can’t cash, old man. (Nice to be called “sonny boy,” though).
“Age and Treachery will always overcome Youth and Skill.” :)
Unless the youth is treacherous, of course. That leaves age. Making one, well, old.
I am not a ‘Cheney hater’, as you, Mr Jessup, would suggest. Others in this thread made an excellent point, had GWB picked a running mate for his second term physically and otherwise qualified to be a viable candidate in 2008, it is quite possible that the Bummer would not have been elected. We all know that Juan was not a viable candidate.
I am also not quick to defend Palin. It is not important. And I do not think she should have been the candidate this time around. Time will soon tell if Mitt picks his running mate wisely. And hopefully Mitt really wants to win this thing...I do not think Juan had his heart in winning from the git-go, but ‘why’ is a puzzlement.
Cheney as VP was in no way physically up to being POTUS and should have stepped down shortly after the 2004 election. Yea he's a real expert on picking a VP alright. I wonder if Ford picking Nelson Rockefeller as the VP was Cheney's idea also?
I will definitely be using that one next time they call.
Wow, dirtboy, you’ve really excited the base with this thread on Sarah.
I wish we could get the same response on an eligibility thread. It will take someone with the courage AND track record of Sarah Palin to really clean house on both sides of the aisle after this election
I have tested it three times before posting and again. It worked every time. Because it is to a specific post on FR, you do have to wait a bit.
Instead he could have said the same thing about Obama, but no, he had to insult Palin. And I am NOT going to take it back. It was a stupid think for him to say. What a jerk! What a disappointment!
No, I’m talking about the source you list in your post—footnote 13.
You’re quoting sources in the midst of the global financial crisis and the middle of her term. She forward funded a lot of state spending and built up the state’s reserves. You’re just all wrong to go after her about her fiscal record as governor and I don’t know what so motivates you.
You said she cut spending. I showed you otherwise. She was only there two years, and ran out before TSHTF.
Youre just all wrong to go after her about her fiscal record as governor and I dont know what so motivates you.
All wrong eh? No, the budget of the State of Alaska says you are wrong.
Look, when she showed up at the convention in 2008 I was all for her. Then I did my homework and witnessed her choices, particularly endorsing Fiorina over DeVore in California. I winced at her appearances on TV, blathering little more than pabulum, repeatedly, waiting in vain for some sign of depth. Nice to look at, but little substance. Hence, as to why I don't like her, she's a grandstanding cheer leader whose record is not nearly as conservative as advertised offering blandishments so vague as to be capable of translating into anything when it comes to hard choices. Wasn't her string RINO endorsements enough for you?
You didn’t show otherwise. You’re quoting from a source from her first year in office, I showed you numbers over all her budgets—of which she got three years through.
I take it you don’t live in a purple or blue state, where sometimes you’ve got to go with the most electable—or the Dems entirely get their way.
And yeah, I wish she’d do more wonk-speak in her appearances, but it is the general principles that she connects with people on—and better than any other conservative pol out there—and her actions are all wonk accomplishment.
I’m not a reality TV/celebrity-type fan, and I’d rather she’d spent her time making less money but working putting out serious policy papers on energy and the global economy at the AEI. I also wish she spoke more clearly and strongly against illegal immigration, rather than cutely, like McCain and most in the GOP do. But I don’t get to micromanage the career paths of our political leaders.
You ought to go and double check your work on her gubernatorial record—and you’ll see that she did more cutting than any of our national-class pols has ever done. She was hugely popular in the voting booth in Wasilla, and grew the town, which is what the residents wanted, by building infrastructure and making it more business friendly.
If you didn’t have some sort of personally-motivated antipathy toward her, you’d see she has a better record of cost-cutting and executive governing than anyone else we have in the national arena.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.