To: rurgan
I remember when the issues of “Most Favored Nation” trading status for China and WTO membership were under consideration, I called my Senators and Congressman on both occasions and asked them to vote against both measures. They did not listen to me. They were so-called “free-traders” like so many other confused Republicans then and now.
396 posted on
08/02/2012 9:37:40 AM PDT by
3Fingas
(Sons and Daughters of Freedom, Committee of Correspondence)
To: 3Fingas
I remember when folks understood what “MFN,” and “free-trader” actually meant. Now, protectionists throw the words around like candy. Suffice it to say, a free-trader wishing free trade with China would advocate a Free Trade Agreement, instead of the tariffs allowed under MFN.
To: 3Fingas
You called it right way back then.
408 posted on
08/02/2012 4:21:59 PM PDT by
rurgan
(Sunset all laws at 4 years.China is destroying U.S. ability to manufacture,makes everything)
To: 3Fingas; central_va; rurgan
I remember when the issues of Most Favored Nation trading status for China and WTO membership were under consideration, I called my Senators and Congressman on both occasions and asked them to vote against both measures. They did not listen to me. They were so-called free-traders like so many other confused Republicans then and now.
"The fine print in China's WTO agreement was in an attached document euphemistically labeled an "accession agreement," which gave China status as a "nonmarket economy" and spelled out thousands of details about special preferences for China
454 posted on
08/03/2012 5:50:34 AM PDT by
khelus
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson