No use for the Euros to fight over a new UN headquarters, they [the UN] already have four: (1) NYC [current one]; (2) Geneva, Switzerland; (3) Brussels, Belgium; and (4) Nairobi, Kenya.
Condemn the NYC HQ and give the UN six months to move out. Four weeks after the drop dead date to move out, the NYC HQ gets imploded. NYC is free to build anything on the rubble.
The U.S. does not relocate to the new UN HQ and it shuts off all funding. The UN dies of its own corruption and greed.
Sounds like a plan....Let’s go for it!!!!
A lot of folks around these parts think and feel that you may be quite squishy regarding some positions and ideas we espouse. I firmly believe that this single issue could reinvigorate a nationwide awakening. A few reasons why, if I may.
1.) Sovereignty of America is every American citizen's birthright. We founded a government to protect it. Conservative ideal only?
2.) The one world collectivists would be hysterically self identified.
3.) More sleeping couldn't help but notice. Many may become inquisitive. Bet there are more Americans that would remember being such.
4.) Should Mr. Romney speak to removing the UN from America, it would still leave open an area of compromise regarding what form of delegation may represent US interests to whatever body remained.
5.) Large Federal expenditure reduced.
6.) Less hostiles and the diplomatically immune within the nation's border.
7.) Real Estate which an American entrepreneur could develop.
8.)There could be no doubt that Mitt gets it.
9.) I would personally volunteer to strike the first chisel for the new image on RUSHmore.
Someone list cons please. I'll start with howls of isolationism. Ignoring the fact that one of the pros previously subsumed discussion of a representative delegation wherever such august body resides.