This country isn't "anti-guns". So that doesn't make the theater "right" in banning those guns.
Nobody forced someone to go to that movie, but the Theater did "force" the movie goers to disarm themselves.
As to the stupid lawsuit, dude went to see a violent movie. He got his money's worth. He should be thanking the theater for this unique experience.
That was uncalled for and non logical.
Think of it this way. A theater or concert can be loud. Say the theater or concert bans earplugs. Isn't the theater, in turn, saying that your hearing won't be affected? Shouldn't you be able to take personal responsibilty and either take ear plugs or not? Whether that requires a hearing loss warning for people to realize that they are responsible for their hearing or not, so be it. But that business should not ban a choice for personal responsibilty.
of course this country is anti gun. You don’t see everyone carrying a gun do you? A gun free zone is anti gun. The moment you walk into someone’s property, you abide by their laws. You still have a choice where to go on their property or not.
If the dude went to see snow white and the seven dwarfs, I would understanding him being traumatized. He went to see a violent movie, and he got it. He got his dose of adrenaline rush.
If a theater bans ear plugs, then don’t go to that theater. Simple.
If a theater bans guns, then don’t go to that theater.
Simple.