Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sacajaweau

“”Why would a harmless package be considered suspicious ??? That makes no sense. Betting this Prof knows a lot more than WE will ever know. Did this Professor get a phone call from Holmes? Was he “treating” “experimenting” with Holmes?? Is there “Hypnotism” involved?? Psycotic drugs?””


I agree with your suspicions.

Why were the cops called to look at a suspicious package and then by accident find another one with Holmes return address?

Did the psychiatrist return the Holmes package to the mailroom after it had been delivered to him on the 13th?

How many times did Holmes meet with this shrink?


27 posted on 07/25/2012 9:57:49 AM PDT by Presbyterian Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Presbyterian Reporter
Someone said the one with Holmes return address was shrink wrapped. If that's the case....forensics should turn up something to chew on if the "shrink" tampered with it.

I'm thinking terrible things....like this kid was manipulated...the mental equivalent of making Frankenstein.

Hope they drug tested him as soon as he was arrested.

43 posted on 07/25/2012 10:07:10 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson