I’m sorry to say, that I would not.
I see present British foreign policy - even under the present British government as a captive of and captivated with Middle East interests and I am not talking about Israel.
I am not suggesting U.S.-Anglo relations should be hostile, but I would say that I believe many of our interests are no-longer in sync or shared.
Keep NATO, but don’t make U.S. policy dependent on or restricted by any NATO consensus on anything outside of the European theater of operations. Why? We are not likely to ever again have a consensus in Nato outside of events in a European theater of operations. Don’t ask for what you won’t get and you won’t be disappointed; particularly if your plans admit the likely failure from asking.
The current case of the MB agent planted next to Hillary and the even deeper sources for that plant in Britain, and throughout society in Britain, clearly attest to how much further along the MB subversion in Britain is. No point in denying it, and no point arguing it publicly with Britain - their political class has their heads in the sand.
Just get on with things and don’t expect the “special relationship” to ever be as special as it once was.
It’s a pity our annointed candidate is such an idiot.