[MinuteGal]

I agree with your assessment. Not matter WHAT she was alluding to in her initial statement to ABC, there's no doubt that the public defenders have swooped down on her and told her to "clarify" the statement as it can be construed as harmful to her son....and also to clear it up if and when she ever goes under oath.

The mother has an "agenda" (a natural instinct to protect her son), ABC has an agenda (a natural MSM instinct to destroy the conservative movement), the public defenders have an agenda (to protect their client).......leaving only the agenda of the perp which is as yet unknown.

Leni

[the808bass]

It is worth noting that the lawyer for the family first checked with ABC to see if they had a recording of the conversation before challenging ABC’s version of the conversation.