Posted on 07/23/2012 3:50:05 AM PDT by Flotsam_Jetsome
I always thought that the perpetrators rifled through Clinton's and McCain's files to make it look as if they were looking for dirt on all three, but that it was Obama's passport records that they were actually interested in accessing. Thus, secondarily, almost as an afterthought, there were "violations" concerning Clinton and McCain. For who stood to gain from a tampering, and why?
There is no way to tell what might have been done to Obama's passport records by those who accessed them. Key information could have been altered or destroyed. On April 8, 2008, after the breach became public, Obama confessed to having taken a trip to Pakistan in 1981. The then-candidate said: "I traveled to Pakistan when I was in college." Journalist Jake Tapper was surprised and said: "This last part -- a college trip to Pakistan -- was news to many of us who have been following the race closely. And it was odd that we hadn't hear about it before, given all the talk of Pakistan during this campaign."
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Well and beautifully said.
Thanks, LJ.
It went viral.
Thank you STAR! I might also add, We don't know what we don't WANT to know...
Thank you melacholy for your support, it’s a sad day when freepers attempt to censor each other, and totally against the idea of free speech, is it not?
Thanks . .
;)
What would be most helpful, dare I say of inestimable value, is if an a well known and respected author like Tom Clancy would write a “novel” using just the facts of this case and publish it ASAP.
It’s very common in the African American community. In writing insurance in Atlanta, I met many a “King Jones” or Prince Jackson” and occasionally the ultimate Eff U, “Master Smith.” Even had a “Doctor Last Name” once.
Not at all, Fred.
Free speech is The First.
You know that, Aussie, right?
Keep up the great work. People like me need help. :-)
It was not my intent by posting this thread to cause any obfuscation, dissension or unnecessary re-hashing of ground already covered on this subject by FReepers who have been here longer than I. Obviously I wasn't around for the 2007-8 discussion on the topic. I simply saw the story at American Thinker and thought it might merit some discussion on FR.
Anyone can take a look at over a year's worth of my comments on this subject and know I'm no fan of the usurper, to say the least!
(Pops gum and sets out on a walk. . .)
Understand and thank you .. you’re doing fine.
“LQH was acquiring personal data from an employee of the security group...”
Where did you get that from? LQH said he had an accomplice in the State Dept, not in Brennan’s company.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.