Why teaching children about sex is evil, is because of their natural sexual formation and the latency period. Even Rousseau recognized this universal formation of children—the need from non-sexual focus on others. It is necessary for boys and girls to identify with the same sex (6-12) at this age so that at puberty they have a strong natural identity of self-—so then they can mature into a focus on the other—opposite sex which should happen at puberty—not before. Boys should prefer being with boys as girls, with girls during a healthy normal childhood.
Introducing homosexuality will confuse the worldview of children. They do not have the experience or understanding to realize that they are NOT homosexual—because nature designed them to prefer the same sex during the latency period—sexuality is naturally suppressed during this age for normal sexual development.
For civil society, we need children to see human beings with dignity and respect—apart from making them a sexual object which demeans human beings and always confuses children too immature to understand the sexual emotions. It always corrupts the worldview of children and forces them to look at others in a sexual way, even their parents.
Sex Ed in schools removes morality and meaning from the sexual act and reduces it to a base urge and encourages children to “just do it for fun!” It is a very dangerous concept to all civil societies which is why the Cultural Marxists devised Sex Ed to corrupt children and destroy Western Civ.
I agree with just about all of your post. The only thing that I somewhat disagree with is only hanging with same sex from 6-12. I grew up and always had a really good female friend as well as male friends. I think it made me understand girls better than most boys.