But at least you didn't try and make it about you and insultingly emote about your daughters being there.
How many Soldiers have we lost this week???? crickets.
I’ll accept tragedy in the classic sense: uninvited bad that happens to people not seeking it. IOW, tragic to those who had been injured by it.
It is, of course, better described by “atrocity” as you have pointed out.
Romney’s reaction is the highest morality when compared with despicable ABC News who politicized it immediately and blamed the Tea Party.
The atrocity is that CCW was not allowed in the theater.
Yet another reason to boycott gun free zones whenever possible. They are killing fields.
Sure he did!
but as a father and grandfather, a husband, an American.
and then goes on how much we should love him! .......
This is a time for each of us to look into our hearts and remember how much we love one another and how much we love
We LOVE America is why we don't want him or his blood brother.
No. Tragedy. If only guns weren’t around, this wouldn’t happen./sarc
What the Dems are looking for is a new Joe Camel. In 1996, the people had repudiated socialized medicine, tax increases, and the First Couple, but they found a scapegoat, Joe Camel, whom Big Tobacco was using to sell carcinogenic cigarettes to school children (back when I used to smoke, I found Camels entirely too harsh; for school children it would be doubly so, but no matter). So now they need a new phony issue to demagogue against, preferably a commodity available to the consumer. Presenting: Guns. It’s Big Guns and the Gun Lobby that’s marketing guns so they can make their evil profits by selling guns and bullets to psychotic killers who are looking to shoot up shopping malls and schoolyards. If only guns weren’t available, those psycho killers would go seek professional help, and not some chlorine and amonia to mix together and throw down an air vent. So it’s a tragedy, caused by guns. This will be at least one of the Dem strategies. And Mit will help them by calling it a “tragedy”. How tragic, that the presumptive nominee is so clueless.