Posted on 07/20/2012 4:18:17 AM PDT by neverdem
President Obamas team perhaps once hoped to reenact Ronald Reagans triumphant 1984 march to reelection. But its now clear that theyre condemned to repeat George W. Bushs much less inspiring campaign in 2004.
The playbook is clear: A barrage of negative advertising to define your opponent before he can define himself; a stream of issues and events to mobilize your base; and a meticulous ground game to squeeze every last vote out of the base come November. As for the small number of voters who havent made up their minds already, you dont try to argue that theyve never had it better, but rather that the other guy is unacceptable. In the end, you win a narrow victory by default. Sure, you havent really confronted the countrys deepest problems. But therell be plenty of time to deal with them next year.
The only justification for such a campaign is necessity, and the only vindication is victory. So how is it going so far? Three recent national surveys offer some clues.
First the toplines. ABC/Washington Post puts the candidates in a dead heat, 47-47; Quinnipiac gives Obama a narrow 46-43 edge, within the margin of error; Pew shows Obama with a 7-point lead, 50-43. ABC/WP places Obamas job approval at 47 percent; for Quinnipiac, its 45 According to the latter, 47 percent of the people believe that Obama deserves reelection, while 49 dont.
Some other ABC/WP findings help explain the electorates reservations about the president. Only 44 percent approve of his handling of the economy, by far the most important issue in this years election, versus 54 percent who dont. When asked which candidate they trusted to do a better job handling the economy, 49 percent said Romney, while only 44 chose Obama. Quinnipiac had it a bit closerRomney 46, Obama 45. Pew offers this oddity: while its survey finds Obama leading 48-42 on improving economic conditions, Romney leads 46-42 on improving the job situation. When asked a forward-looking questionwhat they thought of the presidents plans for the economy, only 44 percent of the Quinnipac sample expressed a favorable view, compared to 50 percent unfavorable. In the ABC/WP survey, only 36 percent thought that Obamas handling of the economy was a major reason to support him, versus 43 percent who thought it was a major reason to oppose him.
Is Romney in great shape on the economy? Anything but. Only 40 percent of the WBC/WP respondents had a favorable view of his economic plans, versus 46 percent unfavorable. And by 43 to 38 percent, they thought that Obama had presented a clearer plan for the economy than had Romney. (In late October of 2008, Obama led McCain by 50 to 32 on that same measure. Romneys doing much better than his Republican predecessor, while Obama is doing much worse than he did four years ago.)
For reasons I dont understand, the Pew surveys have pretty consistently yielded better results for Obamalarger edges and higher shares of the electoratethan have those from most other organizations over the past few months. For our purposes, however, the most important finding from their latest survey is this: there is no clear trend in either candidates support since Romney wrapped up the GOP nomination The presidential campaigns dynamics have changed little in recent months. Quinnipiac finds exactly the same thing, while ABC/WP shows that the boost Obama got from the unsightly Republican nominating contest was at best temporary.
Given the strategic decisions the Obama campaign has made, two questions emerge as decisive. First, what are the prospects for a 2004-style mobilization of its base coalition? By all accounts, Obamas team has a substantial head-start in the organizational nuts and bolts needed for a successful get-out-the-vote effort. But compared to 2008, it may be an uphill fight. In his first presidential campaign, Obama enjoyed a huge edge among young adults and did worst among older voters. But new numbers from Gallup indicate that by an astonishing 20 percentage points, fewer voters aged 18 to 29 say that they will definitely vote than they did four years ago, and their voting intentions fall short of this years average among all registered voters by the same margin. By contrast, relative to the electorate as a whole, more older voters are committed to voting. The same Gallup survey shows diminished enthusiasm among Hispanic voters. In 2008, members of this pivotal group were a modest 8 points below the national average for definite voters. This year, its 14 percent.
To be sure, theres time to gin these numbers up, and history suggests that the intentions of groups who are more weakly attached to the electoral process can change more than those of groups for whom voting is an established habit. Still, Obamas 2008 mobilization effort had the wind in its sails, while this years effort faces some significant headwindsperhaps enough to negate the much-discussed demographic shift in his favor over the past four years.
The second key question for Obamas strategy is whether his campaigns attack on Mitt Romney is succeeding in defining him as an unacceptable alternative. Based on the evidence, its too early to say.
On the one hand, the last round of Bain attacks has clearly rattled the Romney campaign, and a smattering of survey evidence suggests that the sustained ad campaign in swing states has scored some points. On the other hand, the Pew survey found no shift since May in swing-state voter preference.
But its not too early to say that Obamas vital signs look dicey. Over the past 33 months, his job approval has been lower than George W. Bushs at a comparable time in his presidency for all but one week. Bush averaged above 50 percent in the quarter before his successful reelection campaign, while Obama has been stuck in the 46-48 percent range for months. And the famous wrong track measure now stands at 63 percent, versus 55 percent in the days preceding the vote in 2004. If these two numbers dont improve for Obama, his presidency will be in jeopardy. And they probably wontunless the economy perks up noticeably.
I don’t see that at all. The American people have gone against him and the democrats on virtually everything the summer of 2009. Once is policies were evident there is a groundswell against them. He has been very ineffective on every issue since the failed stimulus.
I hope that’ll be the case, but i’m sure he and his inner circle still have some tricks up their sleeves.
The democrats also lost a lot of ground with Clinton in office and yet with the help of Perot he was able to win. No Perot this time, but Obama continues to enjoy unprecedented levels of support from the media who in turn continue to have a huge influence on people that otherwise don’t pay much attention to politics. As things stand today I think Obama loses, but I think he knows this and will try to shake things up.
Certainly at the least i expect Biden to be replaced in order to make it another historic election. Perhaps the first ever Latino to be a VP candidate or something along those lines.
Maybe also some kind of international conflict. Not to mention ratcheting up the voter fraud.It’s going to get very dirty out there.
Notice they neatly tuck this paragraph in the middle hoping readers would miss it, “But new numbers from Gallup indicate that by an astonishing 20 percentage points, fewer voters aged 18 to 29 say that they will definitely vote than they did four years ago, and their voting intentions fall short of this years average among all registered voters by the same margin. By contrast, relative to the electorate as a whole, more older voters are committed to voting. The same Gallup survey shows diminished enthusiasm among Hispanic voters. In 2008, members of this pivotal group were a modest 8 points below the national average for definite voters. This year, its 14 percent.”
Notice they neatly tuck this paragraph in the middle hoping readers would miss it, “But new numbers from Gallup indicate that by an astonishing 20 percentage points, fewer voters aged 18 to 29 say that they will definitely vote than they did four years ago, and their voting intentions fall short of this years average among all registered voters by the same margin. By contrast, relative to the electorate as a whole, more older voters are committed to voting. The same Gallup survey shows diminished enthusiasm among Hispanic voters. In 2008, members of this pivotal group were a modest 8 points below the national average for definite voters. This year, its 14 percent.”
Why Bams losing
Ws 2004 trick wont work
In 2004, the election was a referendum on the incumbent, and the incumbent convinced Americans he had done the right things.
In 2012, what is the incumbent going to do talk about somebody elses tax returns for the next 109 days?
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/why_bam_losing_6hphTPplSqc4KPBJcKn4nO
Uh oh. Collectivism, state control of property and business, suffocating regulations, permanent uncertainty win out over freedom and economic liberty. Not a good sign at all. Maybe Romney's speech this week could have turn this tide...if it had gotten more than ZERO coverage in the MSM.
I didn’t know so many banks were failing. Do you have a relevant link? TIA.
I could feel alot more comfortable about all the current polling in American politics if we weren’t already aware that Dem voters are polled in much higher numbers.
The media needs to be taken to the woodshed after this coming election, also. They have been more than ‘biased’.
Clearer does not mean better.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.