Posted on 07/19/2012 2:56:32 PM PDT by marktwain
John Solomon, writing in the Washington Guardian, is reporting today that B. Todd Jones, the Acting Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), released a video last week to all employees. In the video, Jones warns that there would be “consequences” for any employees who report wrongdoing outside their chain of command. Jones was a federal prosecutor when Attorney General Eric Holder asked him to lead the embattled agency after the Fast and Furious scandal. He is supposed to improve morale and instill a new culture in the aftermath of that scandal. Jones' precise words are:
Choices and consequences means simply that if you make poor choices, that if you don’t abide by the rules, that if you don’t respect the chain of command, if you don’t find the appropriate way to raise your concerns to your leadership, there will be consequences.
Sen. Charles Grassley told Sinclair Broadcast that this video, “ought to be a wake up signal for everybody in Congress who wants to do their job of constitutional oversight. *** It is outrageous that a leader of a major organization of any department, particularly law enforcement, would have the temerity to make those sort of comments."
“This video will cause a chilling effect,” said Stephen M. Kohn, the Executive Director of the National Whistleblower Center. “There are many cases that say whistleblowers can ignore the chain of command. In fact, under the Whistleblower Protection Act [WPA], you may lose protection if you only report to your first line supervisor, and going outside chain is a way to get protection,” Kohn told Solomon. “Also, the WPA says that ‘any disclosure’ is protected, not just disclosures made in the ‘appropriate way.’" Kohn is referring to the problemmatic decision of the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, Willis v. Department of Agriculture, 141 F.3d 1139, 1144 (Fed. Cir. 1998) which held that a disclosure made as part of an employee’s normal job duties is not protected. However, disclosures to outside agencies or members of Congress avoid this exception to WPA coverage. See Whitmore v. Dep’t of Labor, 680 F.3d 1353, 1368 (Fed. Cir. 2012).
Solomon notes that the video is an apparent swipe at "Arizona agents who went outside the agency in 2011 and reported concerns to Congress about the bungled Fast and Furious gun probe that let semiautomatic weapons flow to Mexican drug gangs." Regardless of how one feels about the congressional response to Fast and Furious, we can hopefully all agree that the Arizona agents served the public interest by raising their concerns. Well, maybe all of us except Mr. Jones.
For reference, it is well established that management attempts to impose a chain-of-command rule on whistleblowing are unlawful.The U.S. Department of Labor has said so in these cases: Levelle v. New York Air National Guard, 94-TSC-3/4, D&O of Remand by SOL, at 16-17 (December 11, 1995); West v. Systems Applications International, 94-CAA-15, D&O of Remand by SOL, at 7 (April 19, 1995); Dutkiewicz v. Clean Harbors Environmental Services, 95-STA-34, D&O of ARB, at 7 (August 8, 1997), aff’d, Clean Harbors Environmental Services v. Herman, 146 F.3d 12 (1st Cir. 1998). See also, Brockell v. Norton, 732 F.2d 664, 668 (8th Cir. 1984).
The whole point of having is whistleblower protection is to encourage employees to raise their concerns to the channels that could do something about the violation at issue. If an employer could impose a chain of command rule, then the employer could stop all effective whistleblowing and continue with the misconduct. We have whistleblower protections in place so that employees can serve the public interest and go outside of the chain of command. Hopefully, they will call the wrongdoers to account and get a violation to stop.
It is ironic that law enforcement agencies have such a long tradition of enforcing a chain of command to stifle concerns about misconduct. The tradition is nothing less than a code of silence. The consequences of this code are painfully obvious to anyone who has seen Serpico. If Fast and Furious will teach us anything, it should be that encouraging employees to raise their concerns early and often will help stop miscarriages of justice from growing into national scandals.
Gunwalker / Murdergate ping.
What, pray tell, is “outside” whistleblowing? There is such a thing as “inside” whistleblowing?
There’s no “chain of command.” They’re civilians.
How does our Government treat whistleblowers?
http://blog.vigilantvote.com/2012/07/10/how-does-our-government-treat-whistle-blowers/
They punish them. Is it against the law?
THIS is the Obama administration. THERE IS NO LAW.
Maybe he thinks he’s Archie Bunker. “Stifle yourself, Edith!”
Nothing is going to change with the radicalized DOJ as long as WITHHOLDER and OBAMA are calling the shots. And they are literally.
Obstruction of Justice.
Holder belongs in Federal Prison.
What this bozo just did is a Federal Felony what are the GOP~e gonna do about it ? Not a damn thing! Expect Boehner to try & excuse the Obama junta member.
There needs to be a “faux leak” from Issa’s committee, with a list of individuals involved in the scandal, who the intent is to criminally indict. With a few obvious omissions.
This would both scare those who are involved, and suggest that those not on the list are going to be “cooperating witnesses”, and are thus enemies of everyone on the list.
The idea being that some of those on the list will bolt, and approach the committee with information in the hope of not being sent to prison.
In any event, with such a hoax, morale goes out the window, as does any illusion of being “stand up guys”. None of them want to ‘take the hit’ for Holder or even Obama.
It could very well turn a leak into a flood.
Good idea, sorta like "good cop, bad cop", or Law & Order where Jack says "who ever talks first gets a walk". I like it!
Regards,
GtG
The Acting Director of ATF is a former marine — maybe he thinks he’s still in the military. First I thought we were heading toward a police state — now it looks like martial law — or maybe both.
Freedom (freedumb) of speech under obama!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.