Posted on 07/17/2012 11:55:45 AM PDT by Jim Robinson
I'm sorry folks, but a man who can justify and rationalize in his own mind the wholesale slaughter of innocent human life can justify any kind of evil whatsoever. And he has.
He's justified homosexual marriage, homosexuals in the Boy Scouts, homosexuals in the military. That homosexual couples should be able to adopt children. He's justified that guns are dangerous and should be banned. That free citizens should be forced by the government to purchase insurance contracts against their will or face stiff penalties or taxes. That mandated forced socialized healthcare is a good thing.
That abortion should be safe and legal in America. That since Roe v Wade has been in effect for over twenty years that it is settled law and should be defended as same. That when the government puts Planned Parenthood on the board of his own brainchild signature accomplishment and makes taxpayer funded abortion available on demand, "it's not his fault." That when he appoints liberal judges and appointees, it's not his fault. When a judge rules that homosexual couples should be allowed to marry, so HE orders it done, it's not his fault.
He's justified that the earth is warming and it's caused by man and we are going to have to do something about it. He's justified that since the economy is down and some companies are failing, that it's a good thing that the government stepped in and bailed them out. That government should spend MORE of what it doesn't have to stimulate the economy. That the debt limit should be increased so the government can continue spending even more of what it doesn't have. He's justified in his own mind that fee hikes are not tax increases.
My friends he has justified and personally enacted just about the entire liberal/progressive, abortionist/homosexualist, statist/socialist, big government anti-liberty agenda.
And they have the gonads to ask me for MY vote?
A real Conservative wouldn't even bother running in a faghole state like mass - by the time you got through compromising and tossing aside all your principles for votes you'd be a butt-snorkeling, gun-grabbing baby killer like, well like mitt now is.
Could you imagine Reagan flushing everything he believed in down the toilet in order to move to mass and run for governor?
mitt ran and won in mass because, at the core of his being, he's one of them.
You can’t be honest and compare McCain with Romney - but mittbots aren’t striving to be honest, they can’t and survive.
There is a loooong list of differences between the two - but I’ll touch on only one - McCain served his country and there has not been anyone in the Romney clan, his 5 kids, himself or his father to ever serve America. 3 generations of no spirit of patriotism because there ISN’T any.
And for a bonus I’ll throw in another - McCain isn’t godless!
We now personally fund abortions.
Each of us.
Would a real conservative™ continue to reside in such a nation?
Wonder if they’ll call you the same names they call me.
***Of course they won’t. They are cowards. They treat someone who has authority differently than the man-on-the-street, which makes them bootlickers.
I’d be more than happy to stop calling them cowards & bootlickers if they would stop their invective.
Someone coming onto a conservative website trying to separate a conservative from their conservative principles is not a conservative.
http://www.lifenews.com/2012/07/16/pro-lifers-refuse-to-be-misled-about-pro-life-mitt-romney/
I am a Pro Life Conservative, check the link above. If, God forbid Obama wins and he starts replacing our conservative Supreme Court Justices with Holder and other liberals, you will be sitting here saying, “it’s not my fault!” You are like the WW II conscientious war objector. “I’m not a fan of Hitler but it’s not my job to get rid of him.” damn it, it is our job, who else is going to do it?
Each of us.
Would a real conservative™ continue to reside in such a nation?
A real Conservative wouldn't run on a pro-death platform like mitt. A real Conservative would stand and fight and run on a pro-Life platform rather than sell out my principles.
The really sad part is that mitt didn't even cave. He's a pro-death true believer.
mitt's folk seem to be more interested in pushing the leftist agenda so long as it has an (R) after it.
And the koolaid drinking beaten wives who still can't believe that the GOPe sold them out still delude themselves with hopes of "holding his feet to the fire". The only thing they'll be holding is their own burnt wieners.
I agree, I’d have a lot more respect for them if they would turn their ire to those actually responsible for the growing GOP disaster.
Thanks for getting to the bottom of their so called logic - good work! So a 3rd party would be considered the fraud party to them and should be outlawed. They are giving to Paul what SHOULD BE Peter's and underhandedly giving to Pablo.
Wonder why they think 'WeThePeople' shouldn't have a voice. Oh wait, I think I got it. :) They lose control and after years of deception it's all down the drain! I think they will ban 'no doze' - because the people are awake.
Imagine a serpent, swallowing its own tail. Endlessly. ;)
Like McQueeg’s choice of Sarah, Romney’s choice of a running mate will either energize or neutralize his candidacy.
***Nominating a conservative probably wouldn’t work this time around. McQueeg threw Sarah under the MSM bus, his staffers bad-mouthed her, the GOP slandered her, etc. McQueeg got away with it because he was still a senator after the dust settled. It would be perceived as the headfake it really is. Romnuts would have no future, his VP choice would be first out of the gate for the 2016 race.
I think the only way I would vote for Romnuts is if he nominated Duncan Hunter for the VP spot.
Lovely prayer. Please let me know if you get a SS visit due to the statement “We authorize the destruction of our current government”....
Why do you harass conservatives with this nonsense? If you really believe that someone voting his conscience is a vote for the opposition, then get some Obots to sit out the election due to zer0bama not being librul enough.
I believe I asked a very simple question.
I believe I asked a very simple question.
***Then answer Kent’s very simple analysis of your bogus logic. Using your logic, a 3rd party vote counts for 2 VOTES, not just one.
Oddly enough, all the DUmmies and Kos Kiddies are busily lecturing their own, online, that “a vote for any third party candidate is automatically a vote for Mitt Romney... AND THAT’S JUST THE WAY IT IS!!!”
Logically, then: this means that anyone voting third party, in any given presidential election, is actually casting two votes, simultaneously!
See if you can actually demonstrate -- via simple, straightforward pre-Algebra addition and subtraction -- how Not Voting for Mittens = Increased Number of Votes for Obama.
You'll be the absolute first to successfully do so, if you can.
Certainly, but that’s up to our Father. His justice is being requested. As his ego and law became too much, even the great Nebaccanzer was brought low by Yahweh.
I also posted:
“I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just, that his justice cannot sleep forever.”
— Thomas Jefferson, our father
I don't know if this is as much of a given as you might think. Too many major donors want to continue their access to the government trough, or want another couple of quantitative easings by the Feds, or any other number of government actions that put off a true economic recovery.
Meanwhile, the same GOP-E Congresscritters who would at least part of the time stand with conservatives against a Dem, would instead be working with Dems to push a RINO liberal agenda.
The Presidency is ONE office. A term in office is FOUR YEARS.
The purpose of voting is not to bring about the Kingdom of God, or Nirvana, or whatever. The idea is to vote for the person who is less likely to destroy the country in the course of a four-year term.
That’s ALL your vote for President signifies. It doesn’t represent your personal, definitive choice for Good or Evil. That occurs at death.
I wish all these people who seem to think that their vote represents some cataclysmic, final metaphysical event would get a sense of perspective. Again: Vote for the person who is less likely to destroy the country during the next four years. Rinse. Repeat in four years.
Are you kidding me?
Mitt is not a conservative.
That’s the point.
Yes, that was my point too. The other poster (who I was responding to) said only conservatives and the MSM were attacking conservatives.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.