Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A man who can justify mass murder of innocent human life should be president?
July 17, 2012 | Jim Robinson

Posted on 07/17/2012 11:55:45 AM PDT by Jim Robinson

I'm sorry folks, but a man who can justify and rationalize in his own mind the wholesale slaughter of innocent human life can justify any kind of evil whatsoever. And he has.

He's justified homosexual marriage, homosexuals in the Boy Scouts, homosexuals in the military. That homosexual couples should be able to adopt children. He's justified that guns are dangerous and should be banned. That free citizens should be forced by the government to purchase insurance contracts against their will or face stiff penalties or taxes. That mandated forced socialized healthcare is a good thing.

That abortion should be safe and legal in America. That since Roe v Wade has been in effect for over twenty years that it is settled law and should be defended as same. That when the government puts Planned Parenthood on the board of his own brainchild signature accomplishment and makes taxpayer funded abortion available on demand, "it's not his fault." That when he appoints liberal judges and appointees, it's not his fault. When a judge rules that homosexual couples should be allowed to marry, so HE orders it done, it's not his fault.

He's justified that the earth is warming and it's caused by man and we are going to have to do something about it. He's justified that since the economy is down and some companies are failing, that it's a good thing that the government stepped in and bailed them out. That government should spend MORE of what it doesn't have to stimulate the economy. That the debt limit should be increased so the government can continue spending even more of what it doesn't have. He's justified in his own mind that fee hikes are not tax increases.

My friends he has justified and personally enacted just about the entire liberal/progressive, abortionist/homosexualist, statist/socialist, big government anti-liberty agenda.

And they have the gonads to ask me for MY vote?


TOPICS: FReeper Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abortion; banglist; election; fumr; homosexualagenda; moralabsolutes; prolife; romney; sisterwivesattack; whenmittbotsattack
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 321-334 next last
To: Notary Sojac

Not even Mr. RomneyCARE has made up his Etch-a-Sketch mind.


161 posted on 07/17/2012 2:04:59 PM PDT by Diogenesis ("Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. " Pres. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Future Snake Eater

If you believe Romney is better, vote for him. I do not, so I will not.


162 posted on 07/17/2012 2:08:08 PM PDT by Ingtar ("As the light begins to fade in the city on the hill")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Moleman

I agree.

We cannot take four years of Barack Obama’s lawless destruction of this country. And as much as I agree with Jim’s assessment of Mitt Romney, I do not believe Romney has a vindictive disdain for America, the Constitution, or Christianity, that Barack Obama has, so my family and I will be voting for the lesser of two evils this November.


163 posted on 07/17/2012 2:12:13 PM PDT by Southnsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar
Unlike the angry, self-righteous scolds of Mittens' online Sister-Wife Squadron, I don't consider it my business whom they do (or do not) vote for, come November.

The ultimate dispensation of my own vote, however -- and their huffy, red-faced disapproval of same -- has demonstrably lead to my currently living, rent free, inside of their heads, 24/7.

One might wish for marginally less cramped quarters, certainly... and in an appreciably better neighborhood, to boot. ;)

164 posted on 07/17/2012 2:25:46 PM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("If you're not fiscally AND socially conservative, you're not conservative!" - Jim Robinson, 9-1-10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Future Snake Eater
So who should we vote for?

Good question.

I'm voting for Tom Hoefling.

Win or lose, I'll be proud of my vote for Tom.

165 posted on 07/17/2012 2:28:52 PM PDT by Tau Food (Tom Hoefling for President - 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar

So you’ll vote for Obama?


166 posted on 07/17/2012 2:34:14 PM PDT by Future Snake Eater (CrossFit.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Future Snake Eater

I will neither vote for Obama, nor Romney. Those who believe my vote will somehow magically count for Obama must subscribe to the Roberts’ school of logic: “Lack of activity (a vote) may be penalized with a tax/penalty (claim the voter is voting for the other guy).”


167 posted on 07/17/2012 2:38:34 PM PDT by Ingtar ("As the light begins to fade in the city on the hill")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
you would admit that Mr. RomneyCARE was a carpetbagger who was more liberal than Ted Kennedy

Carpetbagger yes.

More liberal than Ted Kennedy...no because Kennedy was in favor of socialized medicine at a Federal level.

168 posted on 07/17/2012 2:40:59 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: Notary Sojac

If you don’t like my posts, don’t read them. I will continue posting the truth about the leftist Romney and the now leftist GOP whether you can handle the truth or not.

Just saying... KMA.


169 posted on 07/17/2012 2:41:19 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle; Deb
I've been able to pursue a bit of proselytizing myself with those same sister-wives ~ they are so easy ~ really.

Ordinarily a guy like me would never get a chance to get near gals like them, and there we go mind to mind, and they lose!

170 posted on 07/17/2012 2:43:47 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard
Sorry ... not buying that.

If you think the home of Barney Frank and Ted Kennedy would welcome pro-life candidates you don't get Massachusetts.

171 posted on 07/17/2012 2:44:37 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar

Actually, if the failure to vote for Romney is a vote for Obama and the failure to vote for Obama is a vote for Romney, then the failure to vote for either grants you two votes. And, since I’m voting for Tom Hoefling, I will get a third vote.

Now, that’s power, man! Three votes for me!


172 posted on 07/17/2012 2:45:58 PM PDT by Tau Food (Tom Hoefling for President - 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Moleman
Worth repeating!!!

Only if you're a dog that likes returning to slurp up vomit; In this case, the vomit of another dog.

173 posted on 07/17/2012 2:47:09 PM PDT by Sirius Lee (Goode over evil. Voting for mitt or obie is like throwing your country away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Former Fetus
Add Michelle Malkin to the list of TPers who support Mitt.

“I believed in what he was selling: A vision for restoring American greatness and defending success.”- Michelle Malkin

174 posted on 07/17/2012 2:47:49 PM PDT by NoLibZone (We must get down on our knees each day and thank God that McCain/Palin didn't win in '08. Right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tau Food
Great minds think alike. ;)
175 posted on 07/17/2012 2:48:13 PM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("If you're not fiscally AND socially conservative, you're not conservative!" - Jim Robinson, 9-1-10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Well, I’m late to this thread, but I think my position has been pretty clear for some time.

I will not vote for either Obama OR Romney. Both of them are baby-killing, gay-loving, socialistic, narcissistic lovers of themselves, who put themselves above everything else, especially God and their country.

So, what other choice is there? I don’t know, but I cannot in good conscience vote for pure evil, which is what both these men represent. Let’s hope that some way out of this mess presents itself. In any case, it looks as if the Democrat and Republican parties are both dead at this point.


176 posted on 07/17/2012 2:48:26 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar

You don’t believe the split vote will benefit Obama?


177 posted on 07/17/2012 2:49:08 PM PDT by Future Snake Eater (CrossFit.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: WatchOutForSnakes

I understand - as America hangs in the balance, we get hot and say things. I know I do.

But the comment about FR when the angst should be directed to the liberal media who either doesn’t report or reports wrongly - all meant to deceived. We aren’t supported by the Soros’ of the world or like Drudge - supported by mitt, et al - his mouthpiece.


178 posted on 07/17/2012 2:56:25 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

While I agree with everything you say about Romney’s character, and why he deserves none of our trust or confidence, when it comes to casting that one particular vote for one particular office in November, I have to ask this one question: Who is the alternative?


179 posted on 07/17/2012 3:01:49 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan (In Edward Kennedy's America, federal funding of brothels is a right, not a privilege.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

While I agree with everything you say about Romney’s character, and why he deserves none of our trust or confidence, when it comes to casting that one particular vote for one particular office in November, I have to ask this one question: Who is the alternative?

Another question: Who will bring with him to Washington a more evil, demonic horde of political appointees: Romney or Obama?


180 posted on 07/17/2012 3:03:45 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan (In Edward Kennedy's America, federal funding of brothels is a right, not a privilege.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 321-334 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson