Posted on 07/17/2012 7:11:47 AM PDT by Mikey_1962
Its always illuminating when President Obama gives his insights on how Americas free enterprise system works. Here he is last Friday at a campaign event in Virginia:
There are a lot of wealthy, successful Americans who agree with me because they want to give something back. They know they didnt look, if youve been successful, you didnt get there on your own. You didnt get there on your own. Im always struck by people who think, well, it must be because I was just so smart. There are a lot of smart people out there. It must be because I worked harder than everybody else. Let me tell you something there are a whole bunch of hardworking people out there.
If you were successful, somebody along the line gave you some help. There was a great teacher somewhere in your life. Somebody helped to create this unbelievable American system that we have that allowed you to thrive. Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If youve got a business you didnt build that. Somebody else made that happen. The Internet didnt get invented on its own. Government research created the Internet so that all the companies could make money off the Internet.
Of course, the money line in that snippet of the speech is If youve got a business you didnt build that. Somebody else made that happen.
That ranks right up there with When you spread the wealth around, its good for everybody as an Obama statement that seemingly confirms a collectivist streak in his economic cosmology.
1. The less damning interpretation is that Obama is merely parroting Elizabeth Warrens blindingly obvious statement that private enterprise benefits from certain public goods that government provides, such as education and infrastructure, and thus investors and entrepreneurs and other wealthy Americans shouldnt mind paying taxes for them.
But thats a strawman argument and a divisive one at that. Demonization through distortion. Few opponents of higher taxes are arguing that the most successful Americans should pay no taxes only that with the top 1% making 20% of the income and paying 40% of the taxes, that the system is already progressive enough. Indeed, you could quite plausibly argue that the United States already has the most progressive and lopsided income tax system among advanced economies.
2. The more worrisome interpretation is that Obama is adding his own philosophical addendum to the Warren Doctrine: that there is no such thing as individual achievement or merit. All success is directly due to societys collective effort as manifested by government. It takes a village or at least its bureaucrats to accomplish anything. There are no heroes, no great Americans other than The People who express the National Will through Government. As if the nations entrepreneurs all stand on the shoulders of the giants at the Commerce Department and the Small Business Administration and the Energy Department. If entrepreneurs really add no value to the efforts of government, why not not tax them at 90%? That way, more money for government the somebody else in the Obama statement to create more middle-class prosperity.
Does he not think free enterprise is an essential part of this unbelievable American system?
3. Theres also no recognition in the speech of all the many ways government hurts business,
how government wastes tax dollars and cause tax rates to be higher than they should be,
how government impedes business through dumb and duplicative regulations,
how government threatens the viability of the Republic through the monstrous and ever-mounting national debt.,
how the best laid plans of government might not work as well in practice as they do in theory.
In speech after speech even taken in their best possible light the president demonstrates that he is a man of government first and last and through and through, that he sees government as the font of innovation and growth.
Explains a lot, doesnt it?
Right on.
This Statist has to go.
Are not public or common goods available to all? If so, why should there existence be a justification for taxing one man more than another?
My one fear here is: he will not go easily if he does not win in November. His type do not take failure well.
World-class, blue-ribbon, industrial strength, wall-to-wall, unalloyed BS!!! Where is the MSM..the 'watchdog of the people's interest'? Is there not ONE level headed and informed individual calling him/herself a professional who will challenge this drivel?
Does he not think free enterprise is an essential part of this unbelievable American system?
Is it possible that he really does mean “this unbelievable American system” is a total kludge of rampant individualism that must be contained and controlled? And what better way to control it but through Government and Regulations until only those who conform are left.
This jackass must go!...He has no clue what the hell he’s talking about.
Oh, if only Eli Whitney, Thomas Edison, Henry Ford & others could talk now and tell us what Gov't agency helped them. In fact it was a government agency I believe that told Edison he would never succeed without an education, rofl.
Zero's illiterate base will believe anything he says, and carry the message for him, i.e., You rich bastards did nothing for us, get it?
I demand his BASE voters, give up their cars, lights, phones and all things tech., drink your water from your own well, (dig it first), get a wagon and pull it themselves for a change, they can have my YOKE.
You didnt get there on your own!!
OH, how could your forget the Wright brothers, ZERO and company do lubs da’ Jets, their in them so much. Just how did the government help the Wright brothers?
GOD? are you listening? Zero says you had Government help.
One would think the presumptive Republican presidential candidate could have a field day with this - all the way to November!
That would require a backbone.
Why run, if not to win?
Rino's have no problem using an election to gain publicity and losing. McCain didn't run to win with his 'hand off Obama' policies. Rino's love to be the minority party.
“Americans play to win all the time.” - George C. Scott as George S. Patton
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.