Replies

Math says ... that 500 conservatives voted for a third party candidate and Romney lost because he didn't get enough votes. You insist on claiming that the third party votes "favored" Obama, yet one is left wondering if the independents and disillusioned Democrats and Green Party Pinheads who voted third party, also "favored" Obama? What if the winning margin went to Romney -- would those third party candidate votes still favor Obama, or would they favor Romney?

You, on the other hand, are saying that Romney lost because those 500 conservaitves "voted for Obama!" Which is a lie by way of distortion, as you know. But you must stick to that lie in order to demonize those of us who refuse to vote for government tyranny.

Face it. There's only ONE WAY for a Republican to vote for Obama, and that's to mark his name on the ballot. There's only ONE WAY for a Democrat or an Independent or a Green Wacko to vote for Romney, and that's to mark his name on the ballot.

LIkewise, there's only ONE WAY to vote for government tyranny, and that is to mark your ballot for a statist. That's what you plan to do, and that's what you are here urging others to do.

THAT IS THE MATH.

>>here’s only ONE WAY for a Republican to vote for Obama, and that’s to mark his name on the ballot.<<

You really are an idiot. Repeating that lie accomplishes nothing. And many have called you to task on it.

But if you keep repeating it, it won’t change the facts.

Your mind is an 8-track tape. Fine. I guess I have always been wrong in thinking there is a dilution effect by voting for third candidates and it is only 1+1=2+1=3, and so on. It can only be be so. I guess I was wrong and that Ross Perot had no impact in 1992 simply because people didn't vote for Bush 41. Bush didn't win because people didn't vote for him. But, if they had, he might have. But they didn't so he didn't. Wow, I never knew - and here most pollsters said that Perot voters were comprised mostly of traditional Republicans. Bush could not have used any of those 19 million Perot votes. Wow. It is all cleared up now.

Clinton 44,909,8806 votes
Bush 39,504,150
Perot 19,743,821

This is silly. Do with your vote as you will.

3+1=4+1=5+1=6... Don't bother writing back, I'm working on a math problem.