Why? It's called a Road to Damascus Moment. I believe that David Horowitz and Michael Savage had theirs also.
Perhaps at some point you'll have your own Road to Damascus Moment, and your intellectually incurious outlooks (not you, ASF) will change, and realize that while "birthers" like Farah might not have the answers (although I think Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his Cold Case Posse are closing in on such) on the "Obama" birth/life narrative, at least they're asking the questions and trying to get to the bottom of the matter. Or are you saying that there aren't a plethora of unanswered questions surrounding the subject, and Barky's story is on the up-and-up? Even Maraniss doesn't go that far.
Perhaps at some point you’ll have your own Road to Damascus Moment, and your intellectually incurious outlooks (not you, ASF) will change, and realize that while “birthers” like Farah might not have the answers (although I think Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his Cold Case Posse are closing in on such) on the “Obama” birth/life narrative, at least they’re asking the questions and trying to get to the bottom of the matter. Or are you saying that there aren’t a plethora of unanswered questions surrounding the subject, and Barky’s story is on the up-and-up? Even Maraniss doesn’t go that far.
Exactly. The “birther” narrative goes much deeper than simply the birth certificate issues. That is simply how it came to be categorized, then vilified by the palace guard.